Blue Diamond Web Services

Your Best Hosting Service Provider!

May 17, 2024

Gizmodo1


New Post1


May 16, 2024

Tech Crunch

A ‘Super’ El Niño Is Here. Can the US Power Grid Handle It This Winter?

A ‘Super’ El Niño Is Here. Can the US Power Grid Handle It This Winter?

Power Shift is Ellyn Lapointe’s ongoing Gizmodo series that explores advancements in green technology, with a focus on renewable energy, grid modernization, and emissions reduction. 

When signs that a strong El Niño was brewing first appeared in late spring, no one could have imagined just how powerful it would become.

Over the last several months, tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures have risen so fast that they’ve already surged past the record-warm peak of the very strong 2015-2016 El Niño. And they’re still climbing. Forecasts suggest this year’s El Niño won’t peak until December, and by that point, sea surface temperatures will likely have risen about 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit (4 degrees Celsius) above average.

El Niño alters weather patterns across the globe, and weather impacts every aspect of our lives, including the power sector. Its effects are often most pronounced during Northern Hemisphere winter, when Americans rely heavily on the grid for heating and lighting. So what could this exceptionally strong El Niño mean for the grid this winter?

The short answer to that question is: It’s complicated. El Niño-driven weather phenomena can damage power infrastructure and affect energy supply and demand, but its effects vary across the United States. Even strong El Niños like this one don’t guarantee specific weather outcomes. Regional differences in grid infrastructure and energy resources will also shape how vulnerable various parts of the country are to El Niño’s impacts.

With that said, stronger El Niños tend to tilt the odds in favor of expected weather outcomes, so experts can make some highly educated guesses about how this winter could unfold, how the power sector might respond, and what that would mean for American households.

How El Niño could impact US weather

El Niño is the warm phase of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, the biggest source of year-to-year climate variation on the planet. This warm phase begins with a weakening of trade winds that pushes warm water from the western Pacific Ocean to the central and eastern tropical Pacific. When water temperatures off the coast of South America rise, the warming pumps huge amounts of heat and moisture into the atmosphere, altering weather patterns across the globe.

In the U.S., El Niño has historically increased the odds of a warmer, drier winter in the northern tier and a cooler, wetter winter in the southern tier and on the West Coast. That’s largely because El Niño causes the jet stream to shift southward and extend eastward across the South. But again, El Niño does not guarantee that specific weather events—such as ice storms or unseasonably warm days—will occur or be more severe.

El Nino Weather Impacts UsEl Niño causes the Pacific jet stream to move south and spread farther east. During winter, this leads to wetter conditions in the southern U.S. and warmer and drier conditions in the North. © NOAA

“When we see an El Niño, particularly a strong El Niño, what that tells us is there is a much higher likelihood of this or that. It’s not going to increase the magnitude of events,” Erik Smith, a technical lead for climate data analytics at the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), told Gizmodo.

Every El Niño unfolds differently, but forecasters gain a lot of predictive power by examining past events that look similar to what’s developing now, Smith explained. This year’s event is both very strong and somewhat eastern-shifted, like the 1997-1998 El Niño.

That event contributed to the second-warmest and seventh-wettest winter since 1895 for the contiguous United States. As expected, the southern tier saw wetter-than-normal conditions, while the northern tier saw warmer-than-usual conditions. Extreme weather events included flooding in the Southeast and California, an ice storm in the Northeast, and tornadoes in Florida.

It’s highly unlikely that this year’s El Niño will lead to exactly the same outcomes, especially because this event is shaping up to be even stronger. But looking at analogs in the climate record does provide some insight.

El Niño can impact energy supply and demand

Weather affects the power sector by influencing both energy supply and demand. In winter, colder temperatures typically increase demand as people use more energy to heat their homes. Because El Niño tends to favor warmer winters across the northern U.S., heating demand there may be lower than usual. In the South, where El Niño increases the odds of a colder winter, demand for heating could rise.

Because heating systems vary by region, El Niño’s effects on electricity demand do, too, Smith said. For example, most homes in the Midwest rely on natural gas for heating, while electric heating is more common in the South. A milder winter in the North could therefore reduce heating fuel demand more than electricity use, while a colder winter in the South could drive up electricity demand.

Historically, El Niño winters reduce heating degree days (a measure of how much heating is needed) in regions where heating demand is greatest, such as the Upper Midwest and Northeast. Because the South generally has lower heating needs to begin with, any increase in heating demand there tends to be smaller by comparison. Thus, national heating demand tends to be lower in an El Niño year even when the South is cooler than normal.

“That’s great for the system—less stress in the winter,” Michael Craig, an associate professor of energy systems at the University of Michigan, told Gizmodo. “That’s also great for household energy bills. Lots of energy-burdened households exist in the United States that spend a large portion of their monthly income on energy, so warmer temperatures will hopefully defray some of those burdens for those households.” 

On the supply side, El Niño winters can reduce snowpack and reservoir storage in the Pacific Northwest, which generates about half of U.S. hydropower. While that can have a significant regional impact, hydropower only makes up 5.7% of the nation’s total energy mix.

Potential risks to physical grid infrastructure

Because El Niño tends to shift storm tracks toward the South and the West Coast, energy infrastructure in these regions may be more susceptible to damage this winter—particularly transmission and distribution lines.

High winds can uproot poles, snap cables, and send tree limbs or debris crashing into critical components. Heavy rain can cause flooding that submerges or corrodes structures. In California, rain-triggered mudslides are a particular concern, as these events can topple and destroy utility poles, transmission towers, and even sever underground lines. And in the South, ice storms can cause extensive power line failures.

“The more extreme weather events that you have—the higher wind speeds, the more lightning with risk for physical damage to infrastructure, to trees that can fall on lines—the more damage you’d expect to see,” Craig said. 

Whether this strong El Niño actually leads to more extreme weather in the South and on the West Coast this winter remains to be seen, but utilities can look at past events to predict where certain risks are most likely to increase. They also perform seasonal forecasts to anticipate fluctuations in demand.

“I’m sure utilities have been working very hard to forecast what those effects would be and deal with it the best they can,” Craig said.

For example, if a utility expects a colder-than-average winter, it might increase natural gas or heating fuel storage to make sure it has enough supply on hand for generators, he explained. How the U.S. power grid fares this winter will depend not just on the impacts of this El Niño but on how ready the country’s energy systems are to handle what comes their way.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr Says Pete Hegseth Has Final Say On Broadcasting Fort Hood Shooter’s Execution

FCC Chair Brendan Carr Says Pete Hegseth Has Final Say On Broadcasting Fort Hood Shooter’s Execution

Then-candidate Donald Trump once famously insisted he could stand in the middle of NYC’s Fifth Avenue and shoot someone without losing any support. Well, that thesis has yet to be tested, but Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chair Brendan Carr has already abdicated any role with respect to Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s plan to livestream an execution, even if it goes over the nation’s airwaves.

Some context: The FCC regulates spectrum, but has limited powers to regulate the content that actually goes through it. The agency has historically rarely enforced the equal opportunity rule, which requires stations that give airtime to one candidate for an office to give comparable access to others. It can also fine or punish broadcasters who don’t disclose sponsors or air obscene and/or indecent content. Since 1949 the FCC has claimed the power to fight “news distortion,” but the FCC determined its “public interest” mandate gave it that authority; it never received explicit approval from Congress. The FCC has only invoked this power eight times before recently. After 2012, when the Supreme Court restricted the FCC’s indecency policy, the agency’s content enforcement actions have been relatively restrained.

Under Carr, who is very interested in telling broadcasters what to do, the FCC has bent over backwards to weaponize these authorities against networks that Trump sees as enemies. Carr has even threatened to terminate broadcast licenses over unfavorable coverage of the war with Iran. But when it comes to Hegseth’s Trump-authorized announcement that the Pentagon will livestream the execution by firing squad of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan—literally violently killing a man on air for propaganda purposes—Carr has no objections.

Hegseth’s exact vow was to ensure “that people are able to watch it,” though he left it vague as to whether the Pentagon would limit itself to streaming the execution online or Hegseth intends for networks to broadcast it. Carr said on CNBC on Friday that he hadn’t seen any indication the execution is scheduled for broadcast (currently planned for Dec. 3), but he’ll still defer to whatever Hegseth wants to do:

“My understanding is it’s not on broadcast TV, so I don’t think there’s a role for the FCC one way or the other. But I trust Secretary Hegseth. He’s implemented the laws and the regulations that are relevant to the Department of War, and I think he’s doing a great job, and I trust that he’s making the right call on these issues.”

“Ultimately we’re going to defer to Secretary Hegseth and his decisions on how to move forward with this.”

Hasan, who murdered 13 unarmed people and wounded 32 others during the 2009 terror attack on Fort Hood, did not defend himself at trial. He has suggested execution would allow him to still become a martyr (having apparently failed to achieve martyrdom in 2009, when he survived being shot and paralyzed by responding police officers).

The last state-sanctioned public execution in the U.S. was a 1936 hanging of a Black man convicted of raping an elderly white woman in Kentucky. It drew a crowd of up to 20,000 people, many of whom were doubtless there for the same reason many Southerners celebrated lynchings. An actual broadcast would be unprecedented. Trump and Hegseth presumably love the idea because they believe it makes them look tough and masculine, but even authoritarian governments that stage public executions like Iran, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia generally don’t film and release videos of them. That’s more in the wheelhouse inhabited by mass shooters wearing GoPros and terror organizations like Islamic State.

The U.S. does not currently have any state-owned broadcasters other than the Voice of America, which is primarily intended for foreign audiences and barely operational. Trump, Hegseth, and Carr all lack the authority to actually order other TV stations to broadcast the execution. That leaves decisions on whether to air the execution to network executives and managers at individual stations—who may choose not to participate for reasons other than fines, like moral reprehensibility.

The announcement was enough to worry some Republicans in Congress, who are usually happy to act as the White House’s puppets, to at least voice criticism. Vice President JD Vance has already stated that while he hopes “that people don’t forget that [Hasan] is a guy who brutally murdered a lot of innocent people,” he won’t watch any livestream of an execution.

Trump told reporters on Friday that “I really don’t care how [Hasan] goes, as long as he goes” without specifically mentioning support for a livestream, so it’s still possible the administration could lose its nerve. The execution date is roughly a month after election day, and if Democrats retake the House and/or Senate, Hegseth’s livestream plan is likely going to be on their target list.

Break Out the Blue Mushrooms: ‘Common Side Effects’ Will Return in January

Break Out the Blue Mushrooms: ‘Common Side Effects’ Will Return in January

At San Diego Comic-Con in July, we learned that Common Side Effects would be returning in early 2027. Adult Swim has made good on that promise by announcing at New York Comic Con that the trippy animated series about a mushroom with miraculous healing powers—and the chaos surrounding it—will premiere its second season on January 24.

Common Side Effects comes from executive producers Greg Daniels and Mike Judge (King of the Hill; Judge also does one of the voices) and co-creators Joe Bennett (Scavengers Reign) and Steve Hely.

When last we saw our ragtag heroes in the Peabody Award-winning show, Marshall (Dave King) and Frances (Emily Pendergast) had just reunited in the California desert—as fugitives on the run. But that surely won’t last long with DEA Agent Harrington (Martha Kelly) in hot pursuit.

Meanwhile, Harrington’s partner, Agent Copano (Joseph Lee Anderson), is recovering from injuries suffered in a raid gone wrong on a farm secretly cultivating the “Blue Angel,” the mushroom discovered by Marshall that can heal any wound or sickness, including death. Of course, there are some… common side effects, which are definitely going to come into play in season two. The aftermath of that raid, and the clashing interests of everyone who wants to get their hands on the mushroom, are also poised for some ripe exploration.

“At Adult Swim, we always put our faith not just in talented creators who are driven to push animation into new territory, but also in a fanbase that we know will show up and embrace the new without hesitation,” Adult Swim president Michael Ouweleen said in a press release. “The second season of Common Side Effects continues to make possible new things not just for this series but for adult animation as a whole.”

Added Bennett and Hely, “We remain committed to asking important questions, capturing life’s absurdity, telling surprising stories, and, whenever possible, advancing our long-term mission of healing humanity through mysterious mushrooms. So if you’re one of humanity’s ills, know this: your days are numbered.”

Common Side Effects returns to Adult Swim on Sunday, January 24, at 11 p.m., streaming the next day on HBO Max.

Want more io9 news? Check out the best movies and TV shows to stream this month and all the upcoming sci-fi, fantasy, and horror books that should be on your radar.

The First Trailer for ‘Exorcist: Martyrs’ Could Make You Forget All Your ‘Carrie’ Complaints

The First Trailer for ‘Exorcist: Martyrs’ Could Make You Forget All Your ‘Carrie’ Complaints

Speaking about his Exorcist movie back in 2024, horror filmmaker Mike Flanagan casually dropped a very exciting declaration: “I really just saw an opportunity to make the scariest movie I’ve ever made.”

Everyone who’s still nursing nightmares over the Bent-Neck Lady in Flanagan’s 2018 Netflix series The Haunting of Hill House should buckle up for The Exorcist: Martyrs. The first trailer has finally arrived, and suffice to say it looks poised to undo the damage from the stink bomb that was 2023’s The Exorcist: Believer. It may even have the power to reassure folks who felt a bit let down by Flanagan’s new Carrie series at Prime Video.

As we learned earlier this week, The Exorcist: Martyrs will follow an NYPD detective played by Scarlett Johansson who nabs Father Sunday, a killer obsessed with Catholic iconography played by John Leguizamo. He’s slated for execution, but the story doesn’t end there, and the story’s police-procedural leanings—very Exorcist III coded!—expand to envelop priests played by Chiwetel Ejiofor and Laurence Fishburne.

Sasha Calle (Sugar) plays another detective, and Jacobi Jupe (Hamnet) is Johansson’s tweenage son.

The Exorcist: Martyrs hits theaters March 12, 2027. Does the power of Flanagan compel you to check this one out?

Want more io9 news? Check out the best movies and TV shows to stream this month and all the upcoming sci-fi, fantasy, and horror books that should be on your radar.

Free Meals and Other Perks From Big Pharma Really Do Sway Doctors, Review Finds

Free Meals and Other Perks From Big Pharma Really Do Sway Doctors, Review Finds

Hubris threatens doctors in the same ways it does many of society’s other technically daunting, well-paid professions: It’s a hard club to get into, and if you’re in there, well, you must be pretty smart. (This latent tendency likely played a role in Jurassic Park author Michael Crichton going from completing an MD at Harvard Medical School at age 27 to preaching climate change denial by the end of his life.)

Now a stern warning is coming down from a team of medical researchers who have pored over 93 peer-reviewed studies investigating the real-world behavior of millions of healthcare professionals who regularly prescribe medication to their patients. Contrary to what most doctors might tell themselves, free lunches, paid trips, complimentary new drug samples, and other perks from major pharmaceutical companies display a concrete, measurable impact on how frequently a given medical provider then prescribes a drugmaker’s wares.

The new analysis, published Friday in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, documented an almost comical “dose-response” relationship, in fact, between the number of dubious prescriptions written by a doctor for certain drugs and the number of free meals they had received.

“Doctors often think that this is trivial and doesn’t influence them, that they ‘can’t be bought for the price of a sandwich,’ but the data shows this is an effective marketing strategy,” the review’s lead author, pharmacy professor Barbara Mintzes, said in a statement.

Cochrane Pharma Promotion Free Meals InfographicMedical researchers from institutions across the U.S., Canada, Australia, and the UK looked at the relationship between free meals for doctors and prescription patterns for several drugs, including opioids. Credit: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hungry, hungry Hippocrates

“It’s very common for doctors to receive free meals from companies,” according to Mintzes, who works at the University of Sydney in Australia but previously helped lead the U.N. World Health Organization’s Health Action International project. “The more free meals a doctor receives, the more likely they are to prescribe less appropriate or more expensive drugs.”

Mintzes and her collaborators—half a dozen researchers from medical institutions across the U.S., Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom—found that this correlation proved to be true for a range of drugs covered in the studies they reviewed. The data showed that a given drug company’s opioid painkillers, its antidepressants, and/or its medications for high blood pressure and cholesterol were prescribed more times in direct proportion to the number of complimentary meals they gave doctors.

“This is problematic for a number of reasons and it matters because it directly affects patient care,” study coauthor Lisa Bero, a (now recently retired) professor of internal medicine at the University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, said in a statement.

“These less appropriate, more expensive drugs can have fewer benefits or more side-effects than alternatives, or simply be unnecessary in the clinical context.”

Best medicine

Bero, Mintzes, and their colleagues acknowledged that their systematic review stopped short of achieving the statistical robustness required for what’s known as a “meta-analysis,” in large part because their (still quite thorough) effort covered such a heterogeneous collection of studies. The 93 peer-reviewed studies they examined explored the influence of “payments, gifts, or other transfers of value,” advertising and educational events targeting doctors, and free drug samples.

An overwhelming majority of the studies (88%) focused on doctors within the U.S., largely due to the fact that the Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2010 has required pharmaceutical firms to report all details of their payments to doctors for inclusion in a publicly searchable database.

But among these disparate studies, several that tackled the impact of medical institutions’ conflict‐of‐interest policies did offer some cause for optimism. Two studies that examined 3,065 prescribers found that these policies improved the “appropriateness” of the healthcare provider’s drug prescriptions, although the jury appears to still be out on whether these policies help bring down costs.

“It’s encouraging to see that robust conflict-of-interest policies in place tended to be effective,” Mintzes noted.

Did Claude Help an Amateur Astronomer Discover a New Planet?

Did Claude Help an Amateur Astronomer Discover a New Planet?

Last month, Pavel Rabtsevich—a 28-year-old product manager living in Spain—was hunting for planets. He didn’t have any formal training in astronomy or even a telescope. What he did have was an internet connection and subscriptions to multiple AI tools.

He’d been combing through public astronomical data captured by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), a space telescope operated by MIT astronomers and launched by NASA in 2018. As its name suggests, TESS’ main purpose is to help astronomers find exoplanets (planets outside our home solar system) by measuring changes in stellar luminosity; if a star’s brightness dips at regular intervals, it could mean there’s a planet orbiting it and temporarily blocking some of its light from reaching our telescopes.

The data Rabtsevich was analyzing was taken from a narrow sliver of TESS’s full range, captured from November of last year to early January. He handed the dataset—comprising measurements of over 126,000 stars, according to Rabtsevich—to TypeSafe’s Jev, Anthropic’s Claude Code, and OpenAI’s Codex, prompting the AI systems to look for patterns of dimming that could indicate exoplanets, and iteratively narrowing down a list of candidates. “I didn’t take the models’ first answers,” he told Gizmodo. “I pushed them, round after round, to improve their own methods, and checked what they gave me against other models. “I decided which tests to run, judged whether a result was strong enough, and chose what to keep.”

He eventually homed in on TIC 4206066, a star a little smaller than our own Sun and located roughly 116 light-years from Earth. The measurements were unmistakable: an ever-so-slight dip in the star’s brightness every 3.18 Earth days.

Screenshot 2026 10 09 At 10.08.25 am© Pavel Rabtsevich

Intrigued but unconvinced, he went deeper into the TESS data, pulling the star’s measurements from 2020 and 2018. Sure enough, the same dips in the star’s brightness appeared in the datasets for both years, at the same frequency. 

© Pavel Rabtsevich

All the evidence was pointing to the possible presence of an unidentified exoplanet, which he calculated would be just a little over 1.4 times bigger than Earth. With its full solar year lasting just a little over three Earth days, Rabtsevich predicts its surface temperature would be around 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, significantly hotter than that of Mercury—the planet nearest our Sun—and hot enough to melt lead. (His AI-assisted digging also revealed another dimming pattern for the same star, once every 11.13 Earth days, which could be caused by a second previously unknown exoplanet, but Rabtsevich considers the evidence for that one less convincing than the other.)

He ran a total of seventy-four tests with Claude Code, trying to disprove his hypothesis. In one, he gave the agent two of the TESS datasets and asked it to predict when the dimming would occur in the third. Its predictions were correct in all three cases. 

Rabtsevich submitted that report to MIT, requesting that TESS be positioned to observe TIC-4206066 and its possible exoplanet the next time the telescope is scheduled to focus on that sector of space. It was approved. From October 31 to November 26, the telescope will measure the star’s brightness every two minutes. Earlier this week, Rabtsevich publicly posted the times when the star should dim during that observation period, if there is indeed an exoplanet making regular transits across it. 

“If the star dims on time in November, this gets a lot more serious,” he wrote in an X post outlining his findings. “If it doesn’t, I’ll post that too.”

The discovery of exoplanets is nothing new: astronomers have already cataloged more than 6,400. Some (like our own) orbit a star, while other so-called “rogue planets” drift aimlessly through the cosmos untethered to any gravitational center, honoring the Greek root of the word “planet,” which means “to wander.” Billions of exoplanets are believed to still be out there awaiting discovery. In its eight years of scanning the night sky, TESS has already identified more than 1,000 exoplanet candidates that were subsequently confirmed by astronomers in the lab.

Observing subtle changes in luminosity across such vast cosmic distances leaves plenty of room for error. Binary star systems, for example, can be easily mistaken for an exoplanet passing in front of a star. “The biggest challenge with confirming planets is that we have to rule out false-positive scenarios,” says Kevin Hardegree-Ullman, a research scientist at the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI). “This is difficult because: (1) there are just so many candidates… (2) we have limited telescopes… and we are generally competing with all other astronomers for time on these… and (3) some targets are not amenable to follow-up measurements with current telescopes (e.g., they are too faint to get a good signal other than a transit-like event).”

AI, with its superhuman ability to parse through galactic quantities of data, could be a gamechanger—at least when it comes to detecting exoplanet candidates. “Without these tools I couldn’t have processed a data set this size and carried it through to a result,” said Rabtsevich. “Even a couple of years ago my job meant building endless spreadsheets and grinding through data sets, and that ate up a huge amount of time. Here, a search I planned went through 126,000 stars, and then dozens of tests ran on a single one, in about two weeks.”

An AI model NASA deployed a little under a year ago, which was designed to comb through data from the TESS telescope, has already identified around 7,000 exoplanets. And since tools like Claude Code and Codex are publicly available, they could also democratize the discovery process beyond the scientific establishment and among amateur astronomers like Rabtsevich. “AI tools won’t necessarily be helpful in the process of confirming planets,” says Kevin Hardegree-Ullman, “but [they] will likely continue to be used to string together publicly available code to help search for planets and run them through the basic vetting processes… ” 

Rabtsevich is careful to emphasize that correlation does not necessarily equal causation: the pattern he detected in his AI-assisted investigation may turn out to be rooted in something other than an exoplanet. Regardless of what TESS observations of TIC 4206066 yield starting on the 31st, he’s been happy to see that his findings have catalyzed some interest among fellow amateur astronomers. “Since my [X] post, I’ve seen a lot of people start searching TESS data for planets themselves,” he said. “I hope that enthusiasm comes with careful checks, so professional astronomers aren’t left sorting through poorly vetted signals.”

Others are just relieved to finally be seeing a conversation about AI that’s unrelated to doom, gloom, or slop: “There is an awful lot of absolute shite made with the use of AI,” a Redditor wrote in response to Rabtsevich’s post about his findings in a Claude subreddit. “But this… this is fucking incredible. Well done.”

Blogger Found Guilty of Harassment for Sending Shrek Penis Meme to Ohio State Senator

Blogger Found Guilty of Harassment for Sending Shrek Penis Meme to Ohio State Senator

A naked Shrek meme landed an Ohio political blogger in court in a case that has raised concerns about free speech.

D.J. Byrnes was found guilty Friday of telecommunications harassment after sending a Republican state senator an explicit meme of the cartoon character Shrek.

Byrnes is a Columbus-based political blogger who goes by the name “The Rooster.” He’s known for his irreverent humor and coverage of Ohio politics. His Instagram account has amassed more than 46,000 followers and features videos of him hounding lawmakers at the statehouse.

But he apparently flew too close to the sun in May when he sent Republican state Sen. Jerry Cirino a series of text messages, calling him “Young Mussolini.”

The messages also included an explicit image of Shrek. According to an affidavit accompanying the arrest report, the cartoon character was depicted as “fully nude with an exposed and erect humanlike penis engaged in an act of masturbation.” You can see it for yourself here, but fair warning that it comes as advertised.

It turns out Byrnes and Cirino have some history. The blogger has repeatedly criticized the senator and claims his coverage played a role in Cirino losing his bid to become Ohio Senate president.

After Cirino officially dropped out of the race, Byrnes taunted him with the text messages and Shrek meme on May 6.

Two days later, Cirino emailed Kirtland Police Chief Jamey Fisher to file a harassment complaint against Byrnes, according to Signal Ohio.

“Not only is the message harassing but the disgusting picture is pornographic in nature and not something I want to see on any of my devices,” wrote Cirino in the email.

Byrnes was arrested at the Ohio Statehouse on June 1 and spent approximately 23 hours in jail before posting bond.

The Ohio Capital Journal points out that Cirino had previously described Judge Marisa L. Cornachio, who signed the arrest warrant, as a “good friend” and donated at least $2,500 to her judicial campaign in 2016.

“I obviously know a lot of the people here in Lake County, including many elected officials. That’s not the same thing as, as trying to use undue influence and using my, my position,” Cirino told the Ohio Capital Journal when asked about his relationship to the judge. “I would never do that. I respect my position in the Senate way too much to ever let that happen.”

Meanwhile, the trial was overseen by a different judge and ended Friday with a jury finding Byrnes guilty of telecommunications harassment, a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. Judge Michael Cicconetti ordered the blogger to pay a $200 fine and cover court costs.

Still, free speech advocates have argued that Byrnes’ messages were protected political speech.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) published a blog post back in June about the case, arguing that the First Amendment protects speech criticizing government officials even when it’s vulgar. The organization noted that the image was sent to an adult alongside political commentary.

“That’s protected political mockery, not obscenity,” FIRE wrote.

Following the trial, Byrnes took to social media to criticize the trial, claiming that the judge had ruled that the First Amendment did not apply to his case and that his attorneys could not use it as a defense.

“But yeah, I’d have no problem with the conviction if I had sent some random person, and not one of the top four most powerful politicians in Ohio, a nude Shrek,” wrote Byrnes in a Bluesky post. “But it wasn’t that. It was attached to political commentary on his downfall.”

Contest-Winning Microscope Video Thrown Out for Using Generative AI

Contest-Winning Microscope Video Thrown Out for Using Generative AI

The organizers of Nikon’s Small World in Motion photomicrography contest have thrown out this year’s winning entry after determining it violated rules against generative AI.

“After thoroughly re-evaluating the video and supporting materials and consulting with members of our judging panel, Nikon has determined that the winning video did not comply with the competition rules regarding generative AI,” Remi Yuter, a spokesperson for the contest, told Gizmodo via email.

Controversy erupted over the last few weeks after experts noticed National University of Singapore optical engineer Ning Xu’s winning entry, a video of cilia in airway tissue samples taken from a child with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), was full of structures that didn’t appear to exist in biology. It also had an AI-identifying SynthID watermark.

Xu clarified the video originated with actual research footage, but that he had used generative AI for “postprocessing.” Regardless of intent, the red, blue, and purple structures seen in the clip seem to have been altered beyond recognition or fabricated entirely.

“I have been diagnosing PCD for 20 years by examining their cilia waveform, length, cell size and shape,” University of Leicester scientist Robert Hirst told the BBC. Whatever is shown in the video “[looks] nothing like those from PCD patients,” Hirst said, adding the incident had a negative impact on PCD patients, doctors, and support networks worldwide.

“Nikon has adjusted the competition rankings to reflect this decision,” Yuter wrote, noting the decision was based entirely on eligibility rules and “should not be interpreted as a judgment of the entrant’s professional reputation, scientific contributions, or intent.”

The new winner is Nguyen Nam Nhat of Vietnam, who submitted a video of a roundworm and a single-celled organism called Dileptus. Xu’s entry no longer appears on the contest’s page of winners. Yuter added in the statement that Nikon Small World will “revisit rules and evaluation procedures for future competition entries.”

One widely cited set of scientific guidelines, which predates generative AI, argues that scientists should disclose when they color images. Generative AI is a difference of kind, not degree, because it fabricates pixels.

Fabricating pixels doesn’t really fly in science. Melanie White, a developmental biologist at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, previously told Nature that scientific images are data, and scientists “need to be able to trust that what we are seeing is grounded in the underlying measurement.”

Xu didn’t respond to a request for comment from Gizmodo, but we’ll update if we hear back.

Amazon’s ‘Stargate’ Series Is Back in Development, This Time With ‘WandaVision’ Creator

Amazon’s ‘Stargate’ Series Is Back in Development, This Time With ‘WandaVision’ Creator

As expected, Amazon MGM isn’t giving up on its Stargate revival. In November 2025, the studio greenlit a new Stargate series from Martin Gero, a veteran of previous Stargate shows. But in June, fans learned that Gero’s show had been scrapped, reportedly because Amazon execs worried it wouldn’t have the kind of broad appeal that would lure newcomers beyond the franchise’s well-established fan base.

And today, there’s some fresh Stargate news to invigorate that fan base and fans of Marvel TV shows too. Variety writes that Jac Schaeffer, who created the acclaimed Disney+ series WandaVision and its spin-off Agatha All Along, is coming aboard the sci-fi project.

The trade reports that Stargate ties into Schaeffer’s overall deal at Amazon MGM and that a writers’ room will be starting up soon. Schaeffer will executive produce along with Safehouse Pictures’ Joby Harold (Star Wars: Obi-Wan Kenobi) and Tory Tunell.

So far, there are zero plot details to gnaw on, but we can assume based on the rejection of Gero’s take for being too “inside baseball,” Schaeffer’s Stargate will aim to please an audience that could include longtime franchise fans (and they go way back: the original Stargate feature released in 1994; the first series, Stargate SG-1, premiered in 1997 and ran for 10 seasons) and folks discovering the material for the first time.

What do you think of Schaeffer’s involvement in Stargate? Are you excited to see what she comes up with, should this version of the new show move out of the development stage and into actual production?

Want more io9 news? Check out the best movies and TV shows to stream this month and all the upcoming sci-fi, fantasy, and horror books that should be on your radar.

Empromptu raises $2M pre-seed to help enterprises build AI apps

Sheena Leven says she learned two important lessons when building her first company, CodeSee. The first lesson was knowing the difference between what businesses need versus what sounds visionary; the second was that the fundamentals always apply, even with new technologies such as AI.

“Security, compliance, reliability, quality, those things don’t just go away for enterprise applications,” she said.

After CodeSee was acquired in 2024, Leven decided that she wanted to build a product that would let business owners, even those without technical backgrounds, build AI applications. She teamed up with AI researcher Sean Robinson, and last October, the two launched Empromptu, an AI service that businesses can use to build AI applications.

Empromptu claims all a user has to do is tell the platform’s AI chatbot what they want — like a new classification app or a generative recommendation app — and the tool will go ahead and build it. It also provides LLM tools to help users if they want to fine-tune any results, and also lets companies add AI features to their own existing code bases.

Leven doesn’t consider it a vibe-coding platform, though she does look to compete with companies like Replit and Lovable.

“Vibe coding is excellent for quick experiments, but Empromptu is what turns those experiments into real software,” she said. Empromptu, she continued, “turns ideas into production features with built-in evaluation, governance, and self-improvement,” she said. “You ship to real customers, with real data and complete control. If vibe coding is the brainstorm, Empromptu is the build.”

On Tuesday, the company said it had raised $2 million in a pre-seed funding round led by Precursor Ventures. Zeal Capital, Alumni Ventures, Founders Edge and South Loop also participated. 

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

Leven said the fresh capital will be used for hiring staff and developing new proprietary technology.

The company is hoping to target businesses launching in regulated industries or “deeply complex” areas that involve capturing data and creating applications — software that services hotels, for example.

Overall, Leven hopes that founders feel their businesses can be transformed without having to learn the technical skills to take advantage of the AI revolution.

“It’s just like any other skill,” Leven said. “And the beauty of this skill is that AI can help you learn it along the way.”  

This piece was updated to clarify what Empromptu does.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

FTC upholds ban on stalkerware founder Scott Zuckerman

A stalkerware maker who was banned from the surveillance industry after a data breach that exposed the personal information of its customers, as well as the people they were spying on, will not be able to go back to selling the invasive software, according the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.

The FTC denied a request to cancel that ban made by Scott Zuckerman, the founder of consumer spyware company Support King and its subsidiaries SpyFone and OneClickMonitor. 

On Monday, the FTC announced the denial in a press release after Zuckerman petitioned the federal watchdog to rescind or modify the ban order in July of this year. 

In 2021, the FTC banned Zuckerman from “offering, promoting, selling, or advertising any surveillance app, service, or business,” effectively preventing him from running another stalkerware business. The agency also ordered Zuckerman to delete all the data collected by SpyFone, as well as to undergo frequent audits and establish certain cybersecurity practices for his businesses. 

“SpyFone is a brazen brand name for a surveillance business that helped stalkers steal private information,” said Samuel Levine, then acting director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “The stalkerware was hidden from device owners, but was fully exposed to hackers who exploited the company’s slipshod security.”

In his petition, Zuckerman claimed that the FTC order’s security requirements have made it harder for him to run his other businesses due to financial costs, despite the fact that Support King is no longer in operation and he now only runs a restaurant and plans other “tourism ventures” in Puerto Rico, according to the petition. 

When reached via email, Zuckerman declined to comment and referred questions to his lawyer.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

The FTC ban stemmed from an incident in 2018, when a security researcher found an Amazon S3 bucket belonging to SpyFone that left extremely sensitive data — including selfies, text messages, chat app messages, audio recordings, contacts, location, hashed passwords and logins, and more — exposed online for anyone to see and access.

The exposed data included 44,109 unique email addresses and, according to the researcher who found the breach, “at least 2,208 current ‘customers’ and hundreds or thousands of photos and audio in each folder” from 3,666 phones that had the SpyFone stalkerware installed on them.

Contact Us

Do you have more information about stalkerware makers? From a non-work device, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, or email.

Less than a year after the 2021 FTC order, TechCrunch reported that Zuckerman appeared to be running another stalkerware company. In 2022, TechCrunch received a trove of breached data from stalkerware app SpyTrac. The data revealed that SpyTrac was run by freelance developers with direct ties to Support King, in what appeared to be an attempt to circumvent the FTC’s ban. Furthermore, the breached data included records from SpyFone, which Zuckerman was ordered to delete, and keys to access the cloud storage of OneClickMonitor, another one of his stalkerware apps. 

Eva Galperin, a prominent expert on stalkerware, celebrated the news. “Mr. Zuckerman was clearly hoping that if he laid low for a few years, everyone would forget about the reasons why the FTC issued a ban not only against the company, but against him specifically,” Galperin told TechCrunch. 

TechCrunch’s revelation in 2022 that Zuckerman apparently violated the FTC ban, “suggests that Zuckerman did not learn his lesson,” added Galperin, who is the director of cybersecurity at the digital rights nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Stalkerware apps allow their customers to surreptitiously spy on the phones and devices of their loved ones. In addition to enabling potentially illegal activities, for the last eight years, there have been at least 26 stalkerware companies that have been hacked or left sensitive data exposed online, according to TechCrunch’s tally. These repeated incidents show these companies have repeatedly failed to protect the privacy of their customers, as well as the people they spy on.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

SoftBank and Nvidia reportedly in talks to fund Skild AI at $14B, nearly tripling its value

SoftBank Group and Nvidia are in talks to lead an investment of over $1 billion at a $14 billion valuation in Skild AI, a software company building a foundational robotics model, Reuters reported.

The nearly three-year-old startup was last valued at $4.7 billion in May when it raised $500 million in a round led by SoftBank along with the participation of LG Technology Ventures, Samsung, Nvidia, and others, according to PitchBook data. Skild didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. SoftBank and Nvidia declined to comment.

Unlike other heavily funded startups, Skild AI is not building proprietary hardware. Instead, it’s developing a robot-agnostic foundation model that can be customized for various types of robots and use cases.

The company unveiled its general-purpose robot model Skild Brain in July with videos showing robots picking up dishes and climbing up and down the stairs. The company has secured strategic partnerships with LG CNS and Hewlett Packard Enterprise to develop its ecosystem.

Investor interest in AI robotics has been steadily growing. Physical Intelligence, another company developing “brains” for a broad range of robots, has reportedly recently raised $600 million at a $5.6 billion valuation led by CapitalG. One investor who evaluated but declined to fund Physical Intelligence told TechCrunch that its model is still in the early stages of development.

In September, Figure, a company developing a humanoid robot, raised more than $1 billion at a massive $39 billion valuation. Meanwhile, 1X, another humanoid robot developer, was in talks to secure as much as $1 billion at a $10 billion valuation, The Information reported several months ago.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Investor letter reveals skyrocketing growth of Waymo’s robotaxi rides

Six months ago, Waymo disclosed it was providing 250,000 robotaxi rides a week across its service areas, an ever-growing list that includes Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and the San Francisco Bay Area.

The Alphabet-owned self-driving company has been coy ever since, simply stating it is providing many hundreds of thousands of weekly rides. Now, we have a firmer grasp on those weekly ride numbers, thanks to a leaked letter from Tiger Global Management to it investors that was first reported by CNBC.

The letter was an appeal for investment into Tiger Global’s next venture capital fund and called out the gains, so far, of its current fund. Those gains rested largely on its investments in hot companies like OpenAI, Databricks, and Waymo. In the letter, Tiger disclosed that Waymo is now providing 450,000 robotaxi rides per week — nearly double the amount it disclosed this spring.

That number will rise as the company continues its aggressive rollout strategy, too. Waymo, which provides commercial robotaxi service in five cities, has announced plans to launch in 12 additional cities in 2026, including Dallas, Denver, Houston, Nashville, and San Diego.

A Waymo spokesperson declined to comment.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Department of Commerce approves Nvidia H200 chip exports to China

Advanced Nvidia AI chips can head back to China after all.

The Department of Commerce will allow Nvidia to ship H200 chips to China, as originally reported by Semafor, to approved customers in the country. The U.S. will take a 25% cut of these sales, CNBC reported.

H200 chips are much more advanced than the H20 chips Nvidia developed specifically for the Chinese market, but the company would only be able to send H200s that are roughly 18 months old, Semafor reported.

“We applaud President Trump’s decision to allow America’s chip industry to compete to support high paying jobs and manufacturing in America. Offering H200 to approved commercial customers, vetted by the Department of Commerce, strikes a thoughtful balance that is great for America,” an Nvidia spokesperson told TechCrunch.

The news report comes a week after U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the decision on exporting these H200 chips to China was in President Donald Trump’s hands.

The decision to send these chips to China conflicts with Congressional concerns about national security.

Pete Ricketts, a Republican senator from Nebraska, and Chris Coons, a Democratic senator from Delaware, introduced a bill on December 4 that would block the export of advanced AI chips to China for more than two years.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

The Secure and Feasible Exports Act (SAFE) Chips Act would require the Department of Commerce to deny any export license on advanced AI chips to China for 30 months. It’s unclear when legislators will vote on the proposed bill especially now that the Trump administration has given the green light to sell the H200 chips.

While Congress has long been clear about sending advanced AI chips to China — on both sides of the aisle — President Trump has waffled on whether or not to allow the exports.

The Trump administration hit chip companies like Nvidia with licensing requirements to send their chips to China in April before it formally rescinded a Biden administration diffusion rule that would have regulated AI chip exports in May. Over the summer, the U.S. government signaled that companies would be able to start sending chips to China as long as the government got a 15% cut of all revenue, as chips became a bargaining tool in trade talks with China.

However, by that point, the market for U.S.-developed chips in China was strained.

In September, China’s internet regulator, the Cyberspace Administration of China, banned domestic companies from buying Nvidia’s chips, leaving companies in the country to rely on less advanced domestic chips from Alibaba and Huawei.

On Monday, Trump said that Chinese president Xi Jinping “responded positively” to the latest H200 news in a Truth Social post.

This story was updated on December 8 when the proposed decision was confirmed.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Google’s AI try-on app Doppl adds a shoppable discovery feed

Google announced on Monday that it’s introducing a shoppable discovery feed in Doppl, its experimental app that uses AI to visualize how different outfits might look on you.

The tech giant says the idea behind the new feed is to display recommendations so users can discover and virtually try on new items. Nearly everything in the feed is shoppable, with direct links to merchants.

The discovery feed features AI-generated videos of real products and suggests outfits based on your personalized style. Google determines your style by analyzing the preferences you share with Doppl and the items you interact with.

The move comes as short-form video feeds, particularly on TikTok and Instagram, have conditioned users to scroll visual feeds and buy what they see. However, unlike on TikTok and Instagram, where real influencers showcase products, Google’s new feed only consists of AI-generated content.

While some may not be fond of an AI-generated feed, Google likely sees it as a way to surface products in a format that people are already used to. Plus, it makes sense for the company to try a new e-commerce strategy, especially as it continues to lose ground to companies like Amazon and social media platforms.

It’s worth noting that AI-generated videos aren’t new to Doppl. While the app creates images of a virtual version of yourself wearing different outfits, it can turn these static images and convert them into AI-generated videos. The purpose of this is to give you a better sense of how the outfit would look on you in real life.

The new discovery feed is rolling out to Doppl on iOS and Android in the U.S. for users 18 and above.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

Although a feed consisting solely of AI-generated content would have seemed strange a year ago, the idea is now gaining traction. For example, OpenAI in September launched Sora, a social media platform of just AI videos. Meta also has a short-form video feed of AI-generated videos called “Vibes” in the Meta AI app.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Lucid Motors’ former chief engineer sues for wrongful termination and discrimination

The former chief engineer of Lucid Motors, Eric Bach, has sued the company for wrongful termination, discrimination, and retaliation, and claims one of the automaker’s top HR executives referred to him as a “German Nazi.”

The federal lawsuit, filed Monday in the Northern District of California, claims Bach was stripped of his responsibilities overseeing the powertrain division in early 2025 as a result of an HR investigation into the company’s workplace culture. Bach claims to have been targeted because of his German heritage.

Bach first learned about the disparaging comment in mid-2025 — months after the investigation into workplace culture was launched and after losing some responsibilities at the company, according to the complaint. He encouraged a co-worker to report the incident.

TechCrunch has reached out to Lucid and will update the article if the company comments on the lawsuit.

Bach claims Lucid Motors “confirmed” the HR executive made the remark. Bach logged an internal complaint against another Lucid vice president for similarly racist behavior.

He claims Lucid Motors retaliated by trying to force him to resign in October 2025. Lucid fired Bach on November 5, 2025, according to the lawsuit. Lucid Motors’ press release from that day only said he had “departed.”

The lawsuit comes during a tricky moment for Lucid Motors. The company is burning through cash as it works to ramp up production of its second vehicle, the Gravity SUV. It is developing more affordable mass-market vehicles on a midsized platform slated to debut sometime in late 2026.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

Lucid has also been churning through executives. The company’s VP of engineering left on the same day Bach claims to have been fired, as TechCrunch previously reported. Former CEO and CTO Peter Rawlinson suddenly resigned in February, and the company has still not named a permanent replacement. Lucid’s head of investor relations, Senior Vice President of Operations, Managing Director for Europe, and the Vice Presidents of Software Quality and Marketing all left within the last year, too.

Bach, in the complaint, claims to have been ascendant before the internal investigation. An engineer who spent a decade with the company, Bach says he oversaw “all hardware engineering,” “product management and corporate planning.”

Bach states that Lucid’s chairman Turqi Alnowaiser “praised Bach’s loyalty and dedication to the Company and expressed a desire to continue working with Bach.” He also claims board member Andrew Liveris “signaled that Bach would become Chief Technology Officer (the position ‘is yours to lose’) and that Bach could one day become Chief Executive Officer,” according to the complaint.

The workplace culture investigation launched in late 2024, which Bach claims was “tainted by HR’s racist beliefs,” “initially resulted in Bach losing significant responsibilities.” The HR department told Bach at the time that he contributed to a poor culture at the company, according to the complaint. In addition to losing oversight of the powertrain team, Bach claims to have been excluded from board meetings.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Tiger Global plans cautious venture future with a new $2.2B fund

Tiger Global, the investor that spurred the VC bull market of 2020-2021, is reportedly raising a fresh $2.2 billion fund.

The firm sent a letter to potential limited partners, according to a copy obtained by CNBC, seeking to raise the cash for a vehicle called Private Investment Partners 17 (PIP 17). The letter also promises a more humble approach than during the 2021 bull-market madness.

During that time, Tiger Global was moving fast and investing abundantly, a method the venture industry calls “spray and pray.”

PIP 15, raised in 2021, was a whopping $12.7 billion fund that pumped cash into startups at a blinding pace largely at peak valuations, TechCrunch reported. 

In 2021 alone, the hedge fund backed 315 startups, according to PitchBook data, and spurred bidding wars among VCs to get stakes in even unproven startups that ratched up valuations.

When interest rates rose, the party was over, and startups spent years trying to live up to their 2021 valuations, many shuttering along the way.

After the venture market crash in 2022-23, prolific Tiger Global investor John Curtius left to start his own fund, and Scott Shleifer, the firm’s chief of private equity investments, transitioned to an advisory role, while Tiger’s famed founder, Chase Coleman, took on a more direct role.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

Tiger Global went on to raise a much smaller PIP 16 fund of $2.2 billion in 2024, Bloomberg reported at the time, which is, admittedly, still an enormous fund.

Now, on the strength of PIP 16’s blockbuster AI investments, Tiger Global is raising Fund 17. PIP 16 holds stakes in OpenAI, Waymo and Databricks, all of which have had skyrocketing valuations and driven this fund’s paper gains by 33% so far, the letter said as reported by CNBC.

Still, in a nod to the need for more caution than in previous years, the letter promised a more targeted approach. It acknowledged that leaning into AI investments could be risky and require “humility” because “valuations are elevated and, in our view, sometimes unsupported by company fundamentals,” according to CNBC. (Tiger Global could not be immediately reached for comment.)

In other words, even as Tiger Global raises a fresh fund to go after more big AI opportunities, it’s implying that the AI market is in a bubble, and it doesn’t want to drive valuations to even higher, perhaps unrealistic, heights.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Environmental groups call for halt to new data center construction

As energy demand for data centers soars, environmental groups are calling for a moratorium on the approval and construction of new facilities.

More than 230 organizations, including Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, and Greenpeace signed a public letter urging members of Congress to support a national moratorium on the approval and construction of new data centers, citing rising electricity and water consumption. 

“The rapid, largely unregulated rise of data centers to fuel the AI and crypto frenzy is disrupting communities across the country and threatening Americans’ economic, environmental, climate and water security,” the letter reads. 

Several studies have linked higher energy prices to the arrival of new data centers in a region. Consumers have been arriving at similar conclusions: A recent survey, commissioned by solar installer Sunrun, found that eight in 10 consumers were worried about data centers negatively affecting their utility bills.

Electricity prices have already shot up 13% this year, bigger than any annual increase in the past decade.

The effects are expected to be felt most in a handful of states, including Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and New Jersey, which are slated for the largest increase in data center capacity.

Energy demand for data centers is expected to nearly triple in the coming decade, up from 40 gigawatts today to 106 gigawatts in 2035. Much of that will take place in rural areas.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

“All this compounds the significant and concerning impacts AI is having on society, including lost jobs, social instability and economic concentration,” the environmental groups said.

Proposed data centers have become a flash point in recent days.

Last week, protestors marched outside the headquarters of utility DTE in Detroit. The company is requesting approval from the Michigan Public Service Commission to supply OpenAI and Oracle with electricity for a 1.4 gigawatt data center. Protestors said they were concerned about the data center driving up electricity bills, using too much fresh water, and snarling traffic.

Also last week, three people were arrested in Wisconsin during a common council meeting about a 902 megawatt data center that’s slated to be part of OpenAI and Oracle’s Stargate project.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Claude Code is coming to Slack, and that’s a bigger deal than it sounds

Anthropic is launching Claude Code in Slack, allowing developers to delegate coding tasks directly from chat threads. The beta feature, available Monday as a research preview, builds on Anthropic’s existing Slack integration by adding full workflow automation. The rollout signals that the next frontier in coding assistants isn’t the model; it’s the workflow. 

Previously, developers could only get lightweight coding help via Claude in Slack — like writing snippets, debugging, and explanations. Now they can tag @Claude to spin up a complete coding session using Slack context like bug reports or feature requests. Claude analyzes recent messages to determine the right repository, posts progress updates in threads, and shares links to review work and open pull requests.

The move reflects a broader industry shift: AI coding assistants are migrating from IDEs (integrated development environment, where software development happens) into collaboration tools where teams already work.

Cursor offers Slack integration for drafting and debugging code in threads, while GitHub Copilot recently added features to generate pull requests from chat. OpenAI’s Codex is accessible via custom Slack bots.

For Slack, positioning itself as an “agentic hub” where AI meets workplace context creates a strategic advantage: Whichever AI tool dominates Slack — the center of engineering communication — could shape how software teams work.

By letting developers move seamlessly from conversation to code without switching apps, Claude Code and similar tools represent a shift toward AI-embedded collaboration that could fundamentally change developer workflows.

While Anthropic has not yet confirmed when it would make a broader rollout available, the timing is strategic. The AI coding market is getting more competitive, and differentiation is starting to depend more on integration depth and distribution than model capability alone.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

That said, the integration raises questions about code security and IP protection, as it adds another platform through which sensitive repository access must be managed and audited — while also introducing new dependencies where outages or rate limits in either Slack or Claude’s API could disrupt development workflows that teams previously controlled locally.

TechCrunch has reached out to Anthropic and Slack for more information.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch

Google details security measures for Chrome’s agentic features

An increasing number of browsers are experimenting with agentic features that will take actions on your behalf, such as booking tickets or shopping for different items. However, these agentic capabilities also come with security risks that could lead to loss of data or money.

Google detailed its approach to handling user security on Chrome using observer models and consent for user action. The company previewed agentic capabilities on Chrome in September and said these features will roll out in the coming months.

The company said it is using the help of a few models to keep agentic actions in check. Google said it built a User Alignment Critic using Gemini to scrutinize the action items built by the planner model for a particular task. If the critic model thinks that the planned tasks don’t serve the user’s goal, it asks the planner model to rethink the strategy. Google noted that the critic model only sees the metadata of the proposed action and not the actual web content.

A pair of screenshots showing what Chrome's agent model can see from a website.
Image Credits: Google

What’s more, to prevent agents from accessing disallowed or untrustworthy sites, Google is using Agent Origin Sets, which restrict the model to access read-only origins and read-writeable origins. Read-only origin is data that Gemini is permitted to consume content from. For instance, on a shopping site, the listings are relevant to the task, but banner ads aren’t. Similarly, Google said the agent is only allowed to click or type on certain iframes of a page.

“This delineation enforces that only data from a limited set of origins is available to the agent, and this data can only be passed on to the writable origins. This bounds the threat vector of cross-origin data leaks. This also gives the browser the ability to enforce some of that separation, such as by not even sending to the model data that is outside the readable set,” the company said in a blog post.

Google is also keeping a check on page navigation by investigating URLs through another observer model. This can prevent navigation to harmful model-generated URLs, the company said.

A screenshot showing Chrome's agent model asking user permission before paying for an item while shopping.
Image Credits: Google

The search giant said that it is also handing over the reins to users for sensitive tasks. For instance, when an agent tries to navigate to a sensitive site with information like banking or your medical data, it first asks the user. For sites that require sign-in, it’ll ask the user for permission to let Chrome use the password manager. Google said that the agent’s model doesn’t have exposure to password data. The company added that it will ask users before taking actions like making a purchase or sending a message.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

Google said that, in addition to this, it also has a prompt-injection classifier to prevent unwanted actions and is also testing agentic capabilities against attacks created by researchers.

AI browser makers are also paying attention to security. Earlier this month, Perplexity released a new open-source content detection model to prevent prompt injection attacks against agents.

Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch


and this