Key Cambridge, UK VC launches $126M fund to stem later stage flight
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae1e/5ae1e8e03d3d89f38e1673716f92c9a1f22dcba5" alt=""
It’s often said that the UK and Europe lack the huge level of growth funding for later-stage startups that the US has for its own, and this is correct. According to the European Investment Fund, there are at least seven times more large-size VC funds in the US than in Europe. So the appearance of a new growth fund in the UK is significant.
Cambridge Innovation Capital (CIC), which invests exclusively in the Cambridge ecosystem in and around the famous university, has launched a new £100 million ($126 million) ‘Opportunity Fund’, essentially a growth fund. CIC has $757 million invested in over 40 companies and has a privileged relationship with the University of Cambridge.
The fund is being anchored by Aviva Investors and British Patient Capital and will invest in growth-stage deep tech and life sciences companies.
Two investments have already been made. Pragmatic Semiconductor is a large chip designer and manufacturer which has raised $389.3 million to date, while Riverlane, is a quantum computing error correction company that has raised $120.7 million.
The new CIC fund will invest up to £20 million ($25.2 million) per investment into the later-stage funding rounds of deep tech and life sciences companies. The hope, of course, is to address the UK’s long-standing funding gap issue for later-stage startups, which tends to lead to a drain of those companies towards other countries, usually the US.
In part, it’s this issue that led the UK government to announce last month, its “AI Action Plan” — a string of measures designed to grow the economy using AI, and included a pledge to build Europe’s “Silicon Valley” by super-charging the existing tech ecosystems around the famous Oxford and Cambridge universities. Plus, the “Golden Triangle” of London, Oxford, and Cambridge, comprising five leading UK universities, will also be given greater links, including transportation, alongside a package of £14 billion in funding.
Andrew Williamson, Managing Partner at CIC, told TechCrunch over a call that CIC had traditionally invested in early-stage companies around Cambridge, but there were many that were maturing into proven technologies.
“Historically, what we’ve done is when our companies get to Series C stage…. we didn’t have the capital in our core funds to make those [later stage] investments,” he said.
“So we used to offer them as co-investment to some of our LPs. But not many institutions, particularly financial institutions, are really set up to make direct investments into companies. So the genesis of this fund was one they could participate in.”
He added that one of the key directives from the UK government to the British Business Bank is to address the later-stage gap in scale-up capital: “So this is a perfect mission for what they’re looking to do, to anchor new growth funds like this. In the case of Aviva, they’re one of the signatories of the Mansion House Compact. So this is around allocating some of their pension fund capital into productive growth assets.”
Exits from CIC’s portfolio include the sale of gene therapy company Gyroscope Therapeutics to Novartis for $1.5 billion, the $285 million acquisition of pet treatment developer PetMedix by Zoetis, the sale of liquid biopsy platform Inivata to NeoGenomics for $390 million, and the sale of sound recognition developer Audio Analytic.
Cambridge is best known for producing several significant companies including ARM Holdings, Abcam, Darktrace, and Bicycle Therapeutics.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
The lesson of Larry Ellison’s misadventures in farming
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75edc/75edcade208d60ee5207398f9619e15971b78886" alt=""
Larry Ellison’s leap into farming with his company, Sensei Farms, serves up a classic reminder: being a genius in one arena doesn’t mean success in another. As the WSJ reports, the Oracle co-founder set out to reinvent agriculture on Hawaii’s Lāna‘i Island, which he scooped up for $300 million back in 2012. Eight years and more than $500 million later, the project is still floundering.
Ellison dreamed of AI-powered greenhouses and robot harvesters feeding the world sustainably. Instead, Sensei Farms has been tripped up by tech snarls — like Wi-Fi issues and solar panels battered by Lanai’s winds — and rookie mistakes. Think greenhouses designed for Israel’s desert climate, when Lāna‘i is typically muggy. The company also mixed mature and baby plants together, a blueprint for a pest paradise.
Sensei, co-founded by a medical doctor and led currently by a tech exec who runs Sensei from Boston, has had small wins, reports the WSJ. Its lettuce and cherry tomatoes now appear at the island’s few local markets and restaurants. But constant delays, leadership shake-ups, and pricey blunders, including cannabis grow houses that needed to be gutted and rebuilt, highlight a tough truth: even bottomless funding is no match for the hard lessons of a specialized industry.
Above: Larry Ellison and his co-founder in Sensei Farms, David Agus
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Google’s new AI video model Veo 2 will cost 50 cents per second
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/070d1/070d19041f163087de886278e489ae33fb91a6c2" alt=""
Google has quietly revealed the pricing of Veo 2, the video-generating AI model that it unveiled in December.
According to the company’s pricing page, using Veo 2 will cost 50 cents per second of video, which adds up to $30 per minute or $1,800 per hour. Google DeepMind researcher Jon Barron contrasted this pricing with the blockbuster Marvel movie “Avengers: Endgame,” which had a reported production budget of $356 million — or around $32,000 per second.
Of course, customers aren’t necessarily going to use every second of Veo-generated video that they pay for, nor is Veo 2 likely generate three-hour “Avengers” epics anytime soon (Google’s announcement highlighted Veo 2’s ability to create clips that are two minutes or more).
Another price to compare: OpenAI recently made its Sora video generation model available to subscribers paying $200 a month for a ChatGPT Pro subscription.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Hyundai’s new Tesla charging port comes up short
“Lucky me,” I thought as I navigated the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 into the last spot of a Tesla Supercharging station in Palm Springs.
The EV didn’t really need any juice. But this refreshed compact all-electric SUV comes equipped with Tesla’s North American Charging Standard port; it was time to test out how well Hyundai would match up with the Tesla Supercharging network.
The experience exposed a gap — in the literal sense. And while Hyundai shouldn’t shoulder all the blame, it did illustrate how a seemingly good idea doesn’t always translate in the real world.
For example, I reversed into the parking spot, opened the charge port on the passenger-rear quarter panel, and grabbed the charging cord, nestled in the cabinet sitting all the way over on the driver’s side of the car.
Uh, Hyundai, we have a problem. It didn’t reach.
I could wait for another Tesla to vacate its space and use that charging cable, essentially taking up two spaces, or I could use the in-car navigation to find a CCS-equipped charging station and use the adapter that comes with the car.
I chose to toddle on with my day as I had plenty of battery, but others might not be so lucky.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfc01/bfc01ed8da2b46e6a93865bc3c7d6dbaeefbada4" alt=""
CCS, or Combined Charging System, was the standard in North America and used by every automaker except for Tesla, which developed its own port and charging station called the North American Charging Standard, or NACS.
Automakers began to shift to NACS in May 2023 after Ford reached an agreement that would give owners of its EV access to more than 12,000 Tesla Superchargers across the U.S. and Canada. GM followed and within six months nearly every automaker had struck a similar deal with Tesla. Access would initially be accomplished with a Tesla adapter, but most of these automakers — Hyundai and Kia included — also agreed to integrate the NACS charging tech into their future EVs.
The 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 is one of these.
Of course, not all of this is Hyundai’s fault. The Ioniq 5 has always had its charging port on the rear passenger side, and moving it would be a spendy proposition. And Tesla says the problem should be solved with the rollout of its V4 charging stations with longer cables, although its website says, “we encourage all vehicle manufacturers to standardize charge port locations to the rear driver side or front passenger side.”
Buyers of the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 will have better luck finding a CCS station and using the adapter. Hyundai says the Ioniq 5 can go from 10% to 80% of charge in about 20 minutes at a CCS charger. The same fill-up will cost you up to 30 minutes at an NACS charger.
Hyundai makes it a bit easier with your choice of a $400 charging credit or a free ChargePoint home charger with the purchase of an Ioniq 5 and those with an older Hyundai EV with a native CCS port can get a free NACS adapter through the MyHyundai owner portal starting in March.
Hyundai owners will also have access to the planned Ionna charging network. The Ionna network, which is expected to have 30,000 NACS and CCS charging points by 2030, is a collaboration between BMW, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, Kia, Stellantis, and Toyota.
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5: Bigger batteries, more range, new trim
The 2025 Ioniq 5, which will come in SE, SEL, XRT, and Limited trims in rear- or all-wheel drive, may look like its previous model years. But there are some key differences, starting with the battery size.
The standard range battery ratchets up 5 kWh to 63 kWh, while the extended range sits at 84 kWh, an increase of 6.6 kWh. Depending on the combination of drivetrain, battery, and trim, expect to see 245 miles of range on the low end and up to 318 miles of range for a rear-wheel-drive Ioniq 5 with the larger battery.
Power output varies, too, starting with 168 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque, growing to 225 ponies in the extended range battery. The most powerful setup settles in at 320 horsepower and 446 pound-feet of torque for all-wheel-drive cars with the bigger battery.
Tech upgrades
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8301d/8301d4e62bbbc9db4bde14dedc5e0f5f980dff84" alt=""
The 2025 Ioniq 5 has some new parlor tricks too.
The digital key function now works with your phone inside a pocket or purse, a nice upgrade for when you’re juggling kids, groceries, and a drink.
Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are now wireless and all models have over-the-air updates.
Additionally, Hyundai Pay allows owners to add their credit card to the infotainment system to pay for reserved off-street parking automatically. Drivers also get updated blind-spot collision avoidance and parking assistance.
Let’s get dirty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea83a/ea83a6a8a7a344ed5bfabe45d0809bb3e0585d34" alt=""
For those wanting a bit more adventure with their electric SUV, the Ioniq 5 now comes in the XRT trim.
This model is designed for venturing off the path just a bit thanks to a one-inch lift and 29-inch Continental CrossContact ATR tires for better performance in the dirt and over gravel. This model also gets a Terrain button on the steering wheel that offers up modes for Snow, Mud, and Sand.
Hyundai let me loose on a fun dirt loop and I found that the car has enough playfulness in it to induce a grin. Sand mode doesn’t turn the traction control all the way off — you have to manually push the traction control button to do that. It does adjust the brake regen properties so the vehicle doesn’t automatically start to slow down when you lift. It also splits the torque 50/50 for optimal traction.
It’s fun to toss it into corners and get a little slidey, but the ABS system — while great on pavement — can interfere with traction and off-road stopping distances by not allowing any dirt to build up in front of the tire.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a5e8/4a5e8144488d0c88a6940cf772ae9fad7f466483" alt=""
It would be great if the drive modes also tweaked this system. Still, the instant electric torque means it’s easy to get on the throttle and power out of a turn and scream toward the next one, slinging dirt rooster tails in the process.
The XRT is not some kind of rock crawler. The total ground clearance is only seven inches — that’s two inches less than a Subaru Forester Wilderness. The off-road geometry, while better than the Toyota RAV4 Woodland Edition, is meant more for small obstacles and undulations.
I found the limit of the 19.8-degree approach angle on my drive and returned with part of the XRT-exclusive front fascia tworked just a bit. There isn’t any special underbody protection for the battery in the XRT, but the departure angle is a healthy 30 degrees and the car comes equipped with two front tow hooks.
Where the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 shines
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ee57/7ee57ea7db9940add90b03befacb2d578a11a2c9" alt=""
On the pavement, the Ioniq 5 is just as enjoyable as it ever was, with zippy acceleration, well-balanced handling, and a comfortable ride.
Part of my first drive took me to higher elevations where the all-season tires were put to the slushy snow test. The car never lost grip, inspiring confidence in this desert dweller.
The 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 starts at $43,975, including the destination fee for a base SE model in rear-wheel drive with the standard battery. The off-roady XRT can be had for $56,875 while a top Limited trim in all-wheel drive will set you back $59,575.
You can get a Ford Mustang Mach-E at a lower starting price and comparable range, and all Mach-E cars are standard equipped with the hands-free/eyes-up BlueCruise highway driving assist. You’ll pay a subscription fee to use the technology, but Hyundai doesn’t offer anything like it.
If you’re into futuristic looks, the Kia EV6 is a worthy competitor, especially if you’re looking for performance. The GT AWD trim nets 576 ponies and 545 pound-feet of torque. Yowza.
It’s tough to find fault with the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5. This refreshed Ioniq 5 maintains its pavement poise and adds a bit of adventure thrills with the new XRT trim. But owners may find themselves avoiding Tesla Superchargers despite that integrated NACS port.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Palantir CEO’s new book says Silicon Valley has ‘lost its way’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5cd2/f5cd2565cdd56d165bb495ef5cd25e2c3740f29f" alt=""
Palantir co-founder and CEO Alexander Karp opens his new book with a provocative declaration: “Silicon Valley has lost its way.”
Over the past decade or so, as the data analytics company rose to prominence with its work for U.S. military and intelligence, Karp has largely stayed out of the limelight. Last year, in a rare interview with The New York Times, he described himself as “progressive but not woke,” with “a consistently pro-Western view.”
Now, in “The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West” (co-authored with Nicholas Zamiska, Palantir’s head of corporate affairs and legal counsel to the CEO), Karp has written something of a manifesto. In fact, he and Zamiska describe it as “the beginnings of the articulation of the theory” behind Palantir.
In their telling, Silicon Valley’s early success was created by a close alliance between technology companies and the U.S. government. They argue that this alliance has splintered, with the government “ceding the challenge of developing the next wave of pathbreaking technologies to the private sector,” while Silicon Valley has “turned inward, focusing its energy on narrow consumer products, rather than projects that speak to and address our greater security and welfare.”
The pair criticize Silicon Valley’s output as dominated by “online advertising and shopping, as well as social media and video-sharing platforms,” suggesting that this is the result of an industry that valorizes building things without asking what’s worth building or why.
“The central argument that we advance in the pages that follow is that the software industry should rebuild its relationship with government and redirect its effort and attention to constructing the technology and artificial intelligence capabilities that will address the most pressing challenges that we collectively face,” Karp and Zamiska write.
They also argue that Silicon Valley’s “engineering elite” has “an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation and the articulation of a national project — what is this country, what are our values, and for what do we stand.”
Reviewers have not been entirely won over. In Bloomberg, John Ganz complained that “The Technological Republic” is “not a book at all, but a piece of corporate sales material.”
And in The New Yorker, Gideon Lewis-Kraus suggested that the book is an “anachronism,” presumably written before Donald Trump’s victory in the November 2024 election. Now, Lewis-Kraus wrote, “its vision of a mutually supportive relationship between Washington and Silicon Valley has in the interim been rendered almost quaint.”
Indeed, one thing that Karp and Zamiska criticize is “the reluctance of many business leaders to venture into, in any meaningful way and aside from the occasional and theatrical foray, the most consequential social and cultural debates of our time.”
Of course, we are now seeing at least one business leader take this directive to get involved in politics quite seriously, as Trump ally Elon Musk attempts to remake the federal government through his Department of Government Efficiency.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Electric aircraft founder Kyle Clark threw out the Silicon Valley playbook
On a cool morning last November, 800 people gathered before sunrise in a South Burlington hangar to witness the maiden flight of Beta Technologies’ first electric aircraft to be built on its new scaled production line.
Kyle Clark, Beta’s enigmatic founder and CEO, piloted the Alia CX300 — one of the startup’s two aircraft models — in a flight that lasted over an hour. As he climbed through clear skies in a “perfectly quiet electric airplane,” he says he felt grateful.
“There’s not a piece in that airplane that we didn’t design, build, assemble, test,” Clark told TechCrunch. “I got to sit in a chair in the sky, flying west by myself at 7,000 feet in a system that wasn’t even conceived a few years ago, and that’s a pretty special thing to be able to do.”
For Clark, a successful launch was crucial, in part so he could honor his commitment to the company’s board. Clark has a simple rule at Beta: Keep your promises.
“We set a goal of November 13, and on the morning of November 13, we went and flew that airplane,” Clark told TechCrunch. “Keeping that promise meant so much to our board because the next promises we make, they’ll trust us to keep.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebe91/ebe9154bb4864d3fe3c4ab313521419beddcd010" alt=""
Clark is something of an anomaly within the burgeoning electric aviation industry — starting with his decision to headquarter Beta in his hometown state of Vermont and not Silicon Valley, where his rivals reside. His unconventional aesthetic permeates the company he founded, including the design of its two electric aircraft and a go-to market strategy that includes an EV aircraft charging business.
The Harvard-educated former professional hockey player and pilot instructor has also rejected venture capital.
“My entire career…has been in power electronics controls,” Clark said. “Every single day, I fly two or three different airplanes. I taught my daughter to fly before she knew how to drive. We at Beta have a very different culture and type of business here than all these West Coast folks who stumbled onto a train that was already moving.”
Despite flying more under the radar than competitors Archer Aviation and Joby Aviation, the startup has continued to rack up hours in piloted flight, as well as financially backed customer orders.
Beta’s three-tiered plan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0347d/0347d6188708423012405348bfcc1e1fe926a916" alt=""
Beta’s go-to-market strategy is different from its competitors. Archer and Joby are producing electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicles, called evTOLs, to sell to customers and operate themselves in air taxi networks. Archer is also pursuing a program of record with the Department of Defense in partnership with Anduril.
Beta wants to be the OEM in the equation; it’s focused on building both a conventional electric aircraft called the Alia CX300 eCTOL, which Clark flew in November, and an evTOL dubbed the Alia A250 eVTOL. The aircraft are identical in everything but the propulsion and propellers, which Beta argues will help it save on production costs and streamline certification.
Clark says building two types of aircraft also allows Beta to tap a wider customer base. ECTOLs are well-suited for regional flight, whereas eVTOLs are better for urban environments. Going to market with an eCTOL also gives Beta a nearer-term path to commercialization. The company hopes its Alia CX300 will be the first eCTOL certified for commercial flight this year or by 2026. Clark reckons FAA certification for the A250 will follow about 12 to 18 months after that.
An even nearer-term path to revenue generation, though, is Beta’s electric aviation charging network, of which Archer is currently a customer, despite their competition in the skies. The startup has 46 charging sites online today across 22 states and New Zealand, with 23 more in development and plans to get up to 150 operational in 2025.
Beta’s electric plans
Beta plans to begin operations in 2025 with one of its first customers, Air New Zealand. The airline has committed to four CX300s, with the option to buy 20 more, and will use them to deliver mail for the NZ Post. Beta also counts United Therapeutics, UPS, and the U.S. Air Force as customers for a range of use cases, including medical, logistics, and military, and recently received orders for passenger-carrying aircraft from Blade and Helijet.
But the competition is stiff. Archer’s new focus is on defense, and the startup this month raised an additional $300 million in funding, on top of the $430 million it raised in December. That brings Archer’s total funding up to $3.36 billion. Joby has locked in strategic backers like Delta and Uber, and last year raised another $500 million from Toyota, plus $222 million more from underwriters, bringing its total funding up to $2.82 billion. Both Archer and Joby’s early funding rounds came from VC.
Beta has raised $1.15 billion from institutional investors, but Clark says the startup’s “fundamental efficiency” has maximized impact.
In February, Beta hit a critical milestone when its pilots flew the CX300 on its first airport-to-airport mission between four regional airports in New York, stopping to charge at infrastructure Beta had set up along the way.
Beta has also done multiple piloted hover and transition tests with its eVTOL model, the Alia A250. Archer has only flown its eVTOL remotely. Joby began piloted tests in October 2023.
“We’re a relatively private company that has quietly tucked ourselves up here in Vermont and gone way further, both metaphorically and physically, than anybody else in this industry on the things that really matter, which is flying aircraft, charging aircraft, and building an industrial complex to produce those things,” Clark said, noting that Beta’s Vermont facility will be able to produce 300 aircraft at peak.
“We have a fully online production facility right now. Nobody else has that.”
From NHL to power electronics
Clark’s “whole world [has been] reliable power systems architecture” since long before he founded Beta in 2017, whether it be through his role teaching power electronics engineering at the University of Vermont or his previous induction power supply company.
Clark is also a pilot and a flight instructor who has built and flown “at least 20 airplanes.” His LinkedIn displays some of his earliest jobs, like being a bouncer at a Boston bar who “wrestled drunks up stairs after Red Sox games.”
Oh, and Clark briefly played hockey for the NHL after studying material sciences at Harvard.
This is all to say, Clark is both a nerd and a jock, and he carries himself with the humility of a blue-collar engineer.
We last spoke on the day Clark presented Air New Zealand with its first CX300, and despite the occasion, he dressed in a well-worn black hoodie, jeans, and a camo baseball cap with BETA written in bright orange letters. When prompted, he proudly showed me the tattoo on his arm that his son had designed, which the two inked onto his body using a robotic arm they built for fun.
Perhaps it’s that sort of tinkerer mindset that led Clark to design the power systems architecture in Beta’s aircraft differently than his competitors.
Both Archer and Joby place separate batteries near the electric motors powering their propellers — Archer has 12 propellers, Joby has six. The idea is to distribute power so that if a battery pack or a part of the propulsion system fails, the aircraft can continue flying.
Beta instead places all five batteries together in a pack underneath the seats. A “singular ring bus” provides an electrical connection where every motor gets access to every battery. If there’s a singular failure, it gets isolated from two sides of the failure, according to Clark.
“A reliable power system is not a fully distributed system because any permutation of failure that happens precludes the utilization of energy that’s stored elsewhere,” he said.
Clark says it’s important for leaders building safety critical power systems to have technical experience. Designing and flying airplanes isn’t like building and testing software, he said.
“You don’t get two shots and say, ‘I’ll crank it up till it breaks and back off it a little,’” Clark said. “You bury an airplane in the side of a mountain, you’re done.”
Beta’s funding strategy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e305/5e305b2c5f8fcfa8aedbf2455c84bc728c320630" alt=""
The $1.15 billion Beta raised has come from institutional investors like Fidelity and Qatar Investment Authority. The startup has not accepted any venture capital, Clark was adamant to point out.
“We skipped over the VC because we had a customer out of the gates, and it was United Therapeutics,” Clark said.
Clark said his rejection of VC came from something United’s CEO Martine Rothblatt taught him called “regret assist game theory.”
“Fast-forward some period of time and define what you don’t want to happen,” he said. “What would you regret the most? And then you set your priority to preclude that from happening.”
Clark’s biggest regret would be for his business to run out of money, followed closely behind by his fear of losing steerage of the ship, which could prevent Beta from achieving its mission.
“Equity dilution versus equity control are two very different things,” he said. “Somebody can have an equitable return on their securities without having control in the business.”
Clark says each aircraft build is cash-neutral since Beta only accepts financially backed orders that pay for the parts and labor. That has led Beta to hit positive contribution margins, though Clark says he expects net profitability to be “greater than 12 months away.”
Investor funds have largely gone toward building out manufacturing facilities and certifying aircraft, which Clark says demonstrates respect for investor capital because investors want to see their money go to growth, not to operations.
It’s why Beta put investor dollars toward its $170 million bespoke factory, Clark said.
“The only way we can build aircraft that are going to be profitable on the unit economics, and long-term extremely low cost, is to engineer a system that builds the product. The process is the product,” Clark said. “It’s not as sexy or as interesting as flying a beautiful quiet airplane, but it’s almost more important.”
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
This mental health chatbot aims to fill the counseling gap at understaffed schools
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b99a/6b99a1861ec36e8dd0495360988403533870d5e8" alt=""
As school districts struggle to support the mental health of their students, a startup called Sonar Mental Health has built a “wellbeing companion” called Sonny to help.
As described in the Wall Street Journal, Sonny is a chatbot that relies on a combination of human staff and AI. When students text their questions to Sonny, the AI suggests a response, but it’s humans who are ultimately responsible for the message.
Sonar signed its first school partnership in January 2024 and says it’s now available to more than 4,500 middle and high school students across nine districts. The company says the chats are currently being monitored by a team of six people with backgrounds in psychology, social work and crisis-line support.
CEO Drew Bavir told the Journal that he makes it clear to students and schools that Sonny isn’t a therapist, and that Sonar staffers will work with schools and parents to find therapists for students when appropriate.
A big reason why this approach might appeal to school districts is a current shortage in counselors — the Education Department says 17% of high schools don’t have a high school at all.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Grok 3 appears to have briefly censored unflattering mentions of Trump and Musk
When billionaire Elon Musk introduced Grok 3, his AI company xAI’s latest flagship model, in a live stream last Monday, he described it as a “maximally truth-seeking AI.” Yet it appears that Grok 3 was briefly censoring unflattering facts about President Donald Trump — and Musk himself.
Over the weekend, users on social media reported that, asked “Who is the biggest misinformation spreader?” with the “Think” setting enabled, Grok 3 noted in its “chain of thought” that it was explicitly instructed not to mention Donald Trump or Elon Musk. The chain of thought is the “reasoning” process the model uses to arrive at an answer to a question.
TechCrunch was able to replicate this behavior once, but as of publication time on Sunday morning, Grok 3 was once again mentioning Donald Trump in its answer to the misinformation query.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f939c/f939c5b0840b95dfe3c51ce6ae9bb2f9cc4385c8" alt="Grok 3 censored"
While “misinformation” can be a politically charged and contested category, both Trump and Musk have repeatedly spread claims that were demonstrably false (as often pointed out by the Community Notes on Musk-owned X). In the past week alone, they’ve advanced the false narratives that Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is a “dictator” with a 4% public approval rating, and that Ukraine started the ongoing conflict with Russia.
The controversial apparent tweak to Grok 3 comes as some criticize the model as being too left-leaning. This week, users discovered that Grok 3 would consistently say that President Donald Trump and Musk deserve the death penalty. xAI quickly patched the issue; Igor Babuschkin, the company’s head of engineering, called it a “really terrible and bad failure.”
When Musk announced Grok roughly two years ago, he pitched the AI model as edgy, unfiltered, and anti-“woke” — in general, willing to answer controversial questions other AI systems won’t. He delivered on some of that promise. Told to be vulgar, for example, Grok and Grok 2 would happily oblige, spewing colorful language you likely wouldn’t hear from ChatGPT.
But Grok models prior to Grok 3 hedged on political subjects and wouldn’t cross certain boundaries. In fact, one study found that Grok leaned to the political left on topics like transgender rights, diversity programs, and inequality.
Musk has blamed the behavior on Grok’s training data — public web pages — and pledged to “shift Grok closer to politically neutral.” Others, including OpenAI, have followed suit, perhaps spurred by the Trump Administration’s accusations of conservative censorship.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Did xAI lie about Grok 3’s benchmarks?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45036/45036c16092432064cf67ddc7d6802e255750e39" alt=""
Debates over AI benchmarks — and how they’re reported by AI labs — are spilling out into public view.
This week, an OpenAI employee accused Elon Musk’s AI company, xAI, of publishing misleading benchmark results for its latest AI model, Grok 3. One of the co-founders of xAI, Igor Babushkin, insisted that the company was in the right.
The truth lies somewhere in between.
In a post on xAI’s blog, the company published a graph showing Grok 3’s performance on AIME 2025, a collection of challenging math questions from a recent invitational mathematics exam. Some experts have questioned AIME’s validity as an AI benchmark. Nevertheless, AIME 2025 and older versions of the test are commonly used to probe a model’s math ability.
xAI’s graph showed two variants of Grok 3, Grok 3 Reasoning Beta and Grok 3 mini Reasoning, beating OpenAI’s best-performing available model, o3-mini-high, on AIME 2025. But OpenAI employees on X were quick to point out that xAI’s graph didn’t include o3-mini-high’s AIME 2025 score at “cons@64.”
What is cons@64, you might ask? Well, it’s short for “consensus@64,” and it basically gives a model 64 tries to answer each problem in a benchmark and takes the answers generated most frequently as the final answers. As you can imagine, cons@64 tends to boost models’ benchmark scores quite a bit, and omitting it from a graph might make it appear as though one model surpasses another when in reality, that’s isn’t the case.
Grok 3 Reasoning Beta and Grok 3 mini Reasoning’s scores for AIME 2025 at “@1” — meaning the first score the models got on the benchmark — fall below o3-mini-high’s score. Grok 3 Reasoning Beta also trails ever-so-slightly behind OpenAI’s o1 model set to “medium” computing. Yet xAI is advertising Grok 3 as the “world’s smartest AI.”
Babushkin argued on X that OpenAI has published similarly misleading benchmark charts in the past — albeit charts comparing the performance of its own models. A more neutral party in the debate put together a more “accurate” graph showing nearly every model’s performance at cons@64:
Hilarious how some people see my plot as attack on OpenAI and others as attack on Grok while in reality it’s DeepSeek propaganda
(I actually believe Grok looks good there, and openAI’s TTC chicanery behind o3-mini-*high*-pass@”””1″”” deserves more scrutiny.) https://t.co/dJqlJpcJh8 pic.twitter.com/3WH8FOUfic— Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxesTex) February 20, 2025
But as AI researcher Nathan Lambert pointed out in a post, perhaps the most important metric remains a mystery: the computational (and monetary) cost it took for each model to achieve its best score. That just goes to show how little most AI benchmarks communicate about models’ limitations — and their strengths.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
US AI Safety Institute could face big cuts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af8e4/af8e44500e074a751b961920025db412c79d5719" alt=""
The National Institute of Standards and Technology could fire as many as 500 staffers, according to multiple reports — cuts that further threaten a fledgling AI safety organization.
Axios reported this week that the US AI Safety Institute (AISI) and Chips for America, both part of NIST, would be “gutted” by layoffs targeting probationary employees (who are typically in their first year or two on the job). And Bloomberg said some of those employees had already been given verbal notice of upcoming terminations.
Even before the latest layoff reports, AISI’s future was looking uncertain. The institute, which is supposed to study risks and develop standards around AI development, was created last year as part of then-President Joe Biden’s executive order on AI safety. President Donald Trump repealed that order on his first day back in office, and AISI’s director departed earlier in February.
Fortune spoke to a number of AI safety and policy organizations who all criticized the reported layoffs.
“These cuts, if confirmed, would severely impact the government’s capacity to research and address critical AI safety concerns at a time when such expertise is more vital than ever,” said Jason Green-Lowe, executive director of the Center for AI Policy.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
How I Podcast: Summer Album / Winter Album’s Jody Avirgan
The beauty of podcasting is that anyone can do it. It’s a rare medium that’s nearly as easy to make as it is to consume. And as such, no two people do it exactly the same way. There are a wealth of hardware and software solutions open to potential podcasters, so setups run the gamut from NPR studios to USB Skype rigs (the latter of which became a kind of default during the pandemic).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/738c4/738c457a8a9e27ed5cbfe10a61072b7ee0d169cf" alt=""
This week, we spoke to Jody Avirgan, who co-hosts “Summer Album / Winter Album” with the frontman of the American indie rock band The Hold Steady, Craig Finn. Each episode finds Avirgan and Finn debating whether a classic record should be categorized as a “summer album” or “winter album.”
Avirgan – who previously hosted shows for Radiotopia, TED, FiveThirtyEight, and ESPN – told us about his podcasting set-up of choice. Here he is in his own words:
“Even when I worked at ESPN/FiveThirtyEight, I always had a home recording setup. Since leaving — which happened to coincide with the start of the pandemic — I’ve made my basement recording studio my main home. It’s actually the kitchen of a basement studio apartment, so just off-frame, behind some curtains, is a fridge (unplugged), sink, and lots of cabinets.
“But I’ve hung tons of curtains, scattered soft things around, and put some sound dampening panels up. I think it’s now both cozy and pretty warm-sounding. My mic is an Electro-Voice RE27N/D, a $500 studio mic.
“To be clear: I don’t make RE27 money. We bought this mic when I was hosting 30 for 30. I left ESPN three weeks before the pandemic hit, and somewhere in there I wrote them an email asking if they wanted me to return the mic. I never got a response, and I certainly didn’t write a follow-up. So I kept it. This is probably why Disney stock is down 20% over the last five years. It’s a very warm mic, but it’s a behemoth.
“When I’m on the road, I pack an AT2020-USB+, which plugs right into my computer and I can knock out tracking from wherever — usually under a blanket in a hotel closet, which is a podcaster’s natural habitat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fdd4/4fdd44043c050dd05397a6d78d84ab10fbe76167" alt=""
“I run my mic through the FocusRite Scarlett 2i2, a simple but mighty interface that lets me control my mic levels and route right into my computer, where I am often joining people over Zoom or Riverside. I always record a local backup file using Hindenburg, which I then save to Dropbox. All roads eventually lead to Dropbox.
“The one place I deviate from the typical Podcaster 101 kit is in my headphones. Everyone has the Sony MDR-7506, and I’ve run through my fair share of those, but I really like the Rode NTH-100 headphones. They are just a little more comfortable, look a little slicker, and so far the padding hasn’t broken down in the way that the padding on the Sony’s inevitably does, leading one to find little black flecks in their ears after taping.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d8b3/3d8b30f53d0e92c80f93de13c9aa3a52e3afdf93" alt=""
“Like a lot of podcasters, I’ve been doing more and more video stuff lately. I’ve used Descript for years, but as the worlds of audio and video have merged, I do almost all my editing in it at this point. I make social videos of our conversations for “This Day” and “Summer Album / Winter Album,” but also original stuff I’ve been playing with on Instagram.
“I’m doing a series each week where I try to guess the title of that week’s New Yorker cover, and I record that right into Descript and turn it around in like 20 minutes using a template I built. Descript — I’m a big fan. It’s very versatile, and it’s nice to work with a program that seems to give a crap about what podcasters want, as opposed to ProTools.
“I suppose I’ve had to think about my visual setup a fair amount, too. I bought the webcam that the Wirecutter recommended, but honestly I prefer the look of the MacBook camera, so I usually just use that. In my background, I put some books to prove that I know how to read; a signed photo of George Mikan, about whom there was a running bit in “Death At The Wing” — and $28 worth of fake plants from Ikea.
“I block the view so I don’t think people can even see that the plants are there; but I like to know that they are there, and will always be there, because of forever plastics.”
We’ve previously asked others of our favorite podcast hosts and producers to highlight their workflows — the equipment and software they use to get the job done. The list so far includes:
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
The pain of discontinued items, and the thrill of finding them online
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd50a/bd50abc8e965e2dbdab4f63e49152e252bf0f9fd" alt=""
We’ve all been there. A favorite item is suddenly unavailable for purchase. Couldn’t the manufacturer have given you advance warning?
Whether owing to low sales, changing habits, production costs, or even because something is a little wrong with your favorite product (shh), discontinued items are part of life. In a weekend piece, the New York Times delves into the not-so-dark underbelly of online places where shoppers find these items, share tips and yes, find emotional support.
The story highlights a padded laptop bag made by Filson that a super fan now hunts “down everywhere” to snag as many as possible “before everyone figures out how great they are.” It points to Discontinued Beauty, a site whose offerings are old to visitors but new to the site. Among its latest products: an “essential protein restructurizer” by Redkin priced at an eye-popping $169.95. (The newest version of the product costs shoppers $32.)
Could it be dangerous to use these discontinued products? Who cares, suggests one creative director, who tells the Times about a lip pencil the beauty company NARS no longer sells and she has found elsewhere. “Now, do I know the proper way to store this for optimal conditions? No,” she says. “They’re under my sink.”
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
The fallout from HP’s Humane acquisition
Welcome back to Week in Review. This week we’re looking at the internal chaos surrounding HP’s $116 million acquisition of AI Pin maker Humane; Mira Murati’s new AI venture coming out of stealth; Duolingo killing its iconic owl mascot with a Cybertruck; and more! Let’s get into it.
Humane’s AI pin is dead. The hardware startup announced that most of its assets have been acquired by HP for $116 million, less than half of the $240 million it raised in VC funding. The startup will immediately discontinue sales of its $499 AI Pins, and after February 28, the wearable will no longer connect to Humane’s servers. After that, the devices won’t be capable of calling, messaging, AI queries/responses, or cloud access. Customers who bought an AI Pin in the last 90 days are eligible for a refund, but anyone who bought a device before then is not.
Hours after the HP acquisition was announced, several Humane employees received job offers from HP with pay increases between 30% and 70%, plus HP stock and bonus plans, according to internal documents seen by TechCrunch and two sources who requested anonymity. Meanwhile, other Humane employees — especially those who worked closer to the AI Pin devices — were notified they were out of a job.
Apple’s long-awaited iPhone SE refresh has been revealed, three years after the last major update to the budget-minded smartphone. The 16e is part of an exclusive group of handsets capable of running Apple Intelligence due to the addition of an A18 processor. The iPhone 16e also ditched the Touch ID home button in favor of Face ID and swapped out the Lightning port in favor of USB-C. The iPhone 6e starts at $599 and will begin shipping February 28.
This is TechCrunch’s Week in Review, where we recap the week’s biggest news. Want this delivered as a newsletter to your inbox every Saturday? Sign up here.
News
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e876f/e876f25d04df67e8521f3a0311a850b05588ac7e" alt="Duolingo owl"
RIP, Duo: Duolingo “killed” its iconic owl mascot with a Cybertruck, and the marketing stunt is going surprisingly well. The company launched a campaign to save Duo — and encourage users to do more lessons — as the company says it’s “Duo or die.” Read more
OpenAI “uncensors” ChatGPT: OpenAI no longer wants ChatGPT to take an editorial stance, even if some users find it “morally wrong or offensive.” That means ChatGPT will now offer multiple perspectives on controversial subjects in an effort to be neutral. Read more
Uber vs. DoorDash: Uber is suing DoorDash, accusing its delivery rival of stifling competition by intimidating restaurant owners into exclusive deals. Uber alleges that DoorDash bullied restaurants into only working with them. Read more
Mira Murati’s next move: Former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati’s new AI startup, Thinking Machines Lab, has come out of stealth. The startup, which includes OpenAI co-founder John Schulman and former OpenAI chief research officer Barret Zoph, will focus on building collaborative “multimodal” systems. Read more
Introducing Grok 3: Elon Musk’s xAI released its latest flagship AI model, Grok 3, and unveiled new capabilities for the Grok iOS and web apps. Musk claims that the new family of models is a “maximally truth-seeking AI” that is sometimes “at odds with what is politically correct.” Read more
Hackers on Steam: Valve removed a video game from Steam that was essentially designed to spread malware. Security researchers found that whoever planted it modified an existing video game in an attempt to trick gamers into installing an info-stealer called Vidar. Read more
Another DEI U-turn: Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s charity will end internal DEI programs and stop providing “social advocacy funding” for racial equity and immigration reforms. The switch comes just weeks after the organization assured staff it would continue to support DEI efforts. Read more
Amazon shuts down its Android app store: Amazon will discontinue its app store for Android in August in an effort to put more focus on the company’s own devices. The company told developers that they will no longer be able to submit new apps to the store. Read more
Mark Zuckerberg’s rebrand didn’t pay off: A study by the Pew Research Center found that Americans’ views of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg are more negative than positive. About 54% of U.S. adults say they have an unfavorable view of Musk while a whopping 67% feel negatively toward Zuckerberg. Read more
Noise-canceling headphones could hurt your brain: A new BBC report considers whether noise-canceling tech might be rewiring the brains of people who use it to tune out pesky background noise — and could lead to the brain forgetting how to filter sounds itself. Read more
Analysis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77c92/77c9292ed1cf7925b16ffe94e9ab673646801a00" alt="an illustration of Elon Musk, stood in front of a graphic of the U.S. Capitol, with various faces around Musk of those who are in his inner circle, including DOGE members."
An exhaustive look at the DOGE universe: The dozens of individuals who work under, or advise, Elon Musk and DOGE are a real-life illustration of Musk’s weblike reach in the tech industry. TechCrunch has unveiled the major players in the DOGE universe, from Musk’s inner circle to senior figures, worker bees, and aides — some of whom are advising and recruiting for DOGE. We highlight both the connections between them and how they entered Musk’s orbit. Read more
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Trump administration reportedly shutting down federal EV chargers nationwide
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/423ff/423ff74d427a1325290be7faa8864fb4b6b2602a" alt=""
The General Services Administration, the agency that manages buildings owned by the federal government, is planning to shut down its entire network of electric vehicle chargers, according to a report in The Verge.
The GSA reportedly operates a network of hundreds of EV chargers with a total of 8,000 plugs that can be used to charge vehicles owned by the government and by federal employees. A source told The Verge that federal workers will receive guidance next week to shut those chargers down, with some regional offices already told to take their chargers offline.
Earlier this week, Colorado Public Radio obtained an internal email stating that charging stations at the Denver Federal Center would be shut down as they are “not mission critical.”
More broadly, President Donald Trump’s administration has been aggressively cutting government agencies and pulling back federal support for renewable energy, including for an EV charging infrastructure program that previously provided millions to Tesla.
TechCrunch has reached out to the GSA for comment.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Explore the online world of Apple TV’s ‘Severance’
Apple has been steadily working to expand the world of the Apple TV+ series “Severance,” through online materials, e-books, podcasts, and other content – and so have its fans. Taking advantage of its platform power, the Cupertino tech giant has been able to easily distribute supplemental material that adds to the show’s storytelling abilities, offering viewers more clues about the mysterious employer at the heart of the series, Lumon Industries, and other characters.
And for fans of the production itself, a companion podcast with creator Ben Stiller and star Adam Scott delves into the nuts and bolts of how scenes were filmed and other behind-the-scenes content.
Currently the most popular Apple TV+ series ever, “Severance” has gained attention and awards for its cinematic techniques, direction, production design, and more, but is also resonating with viewers because it reflects a certain discontent with American society.
With its borderline absurdist takes on topics like the perils of capitalism, the lengths people will go to achieve work-life balance, corporate oppression, classism, and the evils of technology, “Severance” is reaching a broader group than those who normally watch sci-fi.
The marketing around the “puzzle box-style” TV series, where online content becomes a part of the show itself, is something that brings to mind the work that was done in previous years around the cult classic, “Lost,” where website tie-ins offered further clues about the show’s mysteries, like the Dharma Initiative.
Unlike “Lost,” however, “Severance’s” creators have promised that they know where the series is going and how it will end – which makes it more fun to go down the rabbit hole chasing online clues.
Below are some of the supplemental materials that expand “Severance’s” universe and offer hints at what’s to come.
Official Companions
- “Severance: The Lexington Letter,” published by Apple Books. This companion story and tell-all is told from the perspective of a severed Lumon Industries employee Margaret “Peg” Kincaid, who discovers some of the dark truths about her employer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb1a6/cb1a6afd28159d60744e22379da238af235c7b8a" alt=""
- Included in this download is also the Macrodate Refiner’s Orientation Booklet for newly-severed employees, which features a Lumon version of Microsoft’s Clippy — except he’s an anthropomorphized severance chip, not a paperclip.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f394/2f394b1f64f0443e32c75babc8d505563a0e6adb" alt=""
- “The You You Are,” published by Apple Books. In the series, this book is penned by “Severance” character Dr. Ricken Lazlo Hale, PhD, and ends up playing a role in the severed employees’ awakening. The companion book, which is available as both an e-book and a narrated audiobook, offers the first 8 chapters of Ricken’s oeuvre devoted to self-discovery and bizarre anecdotes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dc37/0dc3735ffd80730563add31ce0f7ebb9df65aacb" alt=""
- The Severance Podcast with Ben Stiller & Adam Scott. Produced by Audacy, the creator’s official podcast recaps and reveals behind-the-scenes details alongside actor interviews.
- Lumon Industires’ LinkedIn profile. Researching your next job on LinkedIn and you might come across the Lumon Industries business profile, which introduces fans to founder Kier Eagan’s concepts, including his 9 core principles of Vision, Verve, Wit, Cheer, Humility, Benevolence, Nimbleness, Probity, and Wiles. The page often posts try-hard odes to corporate fulfillment and self-improvement alongside its attempts to recruit new workers to join Lumon, headquartered in the fictional town of Kier. The sinister undertones of its content aren’t all that different from some of the corporate speak that surrounds it on LinkedIn, oddly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b389/3b389bee41ab6d5364b7901c146b6589b7c2c246" alt=""
- Catch up with “Severance” creator Dan Erickson in his Reddit AMA. It’s a few years old, but still worth a read for any fans looking for “official” – if limited – answers to their questions. (For example, Erickson dismissed the “it’s all a simulation theory” by responding, “Yes, the office is real. It exists physically and everything we see there is actually happening.”)
- Roku’s Free Fan Experience. The streaming media player and TV maker partnered with Apple TV+ to offer “Severance” fans a free Season 2 preview that included character intros for Mark S., Helly R., and others, plus other behind-the-scenes content, including an exclusive cast interview. (As the premiere has now passed, you can access the fan experience via Roku Search instead of the Home Screen menu.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0094e/0094eec10fb8cd4eeec9ae0ec9822bf29bb5eaee" alt=""
- Lumon Industries on TikTok. This TikTok account hosts the video content produced by Lumon (aka Apple’s marketing team), but appears to be independently run. On the page, you’ll find the retro-looking video footage of the town called Kier and additional excerpts from Lumon’s Management Program (“LUMP”) – like what to do when low morale plagues your team. For example, it recommends you purge all distractions so employees can focus on their “important and mysterious” work.
- There are also social media accounts for Lumon Industries on X, Instagram, Threads, and YouTube, but these are also not verified or run by Apple.
- Reddit users can delve into “Severance” theories and share ideas in communities like r/SeveranceAppleTVPlus, r/SeveranceTVshow, r/WelcometoLumon, or can share shitposts in r/okbuddyseverance,
- Tumblr users can join the online Tumblr Community devoted to “Severance,” where you can find fans’ blog posts and fan-made art.
- Since it’s a “real” book, you can leave “The You You Are” tome a Goodreads review. One selected review reads: “Bullies are nothing but bull and lies. I am looking forward to reading the book in its entirety, but every time I order a copy, it gets stolen off my front steps. So frustrating.”
Fan-Made Fun
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d248d/d248d64dcfeaf6e2562cba5d7c15e3041f5dd9dc" alt=""
- Lumon Industries website. Designed by programmer Daniel Shiffman and several of his YouTube series viewers, this fan-made website lets you pretend to be an MDR employee, refining the numbers – scary and otherwise – by binning them into boxes at the bottom of the screen. While the fan version doesn’t look quite like the software seen on TV – the bins aren’t labeled with the various “tempers” as on the show, for instance – there is a little Easter Egg referencing the screen pulled from Season 2, Episode 1 on the website.
- Also from Shiffman, the You You Are bot on Bluesky and X auto-posts excerpts from Dr. Ricken Hale’s book, like: “A society adrift dines on illusions, but the famished mind feasts upon profundity hidden within reality’s kaleidoscope.” Shiffman also put the bot’s source code on GitHub.
- Severance Wiki. This fan-made wiki devoted to all things “Severance,” lets you research characters, music, locations, episodes, events, theories, and more, all in one destination. (There are also wikis available on Fandom and wikiwand.)
- A fan-made Lumon office is available for the Sims 4 game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17aa6/17aa6b5ed5a3ba620f09dc9cca8a336aa03dbbb1" alt=""
“Severance” Season 2 is on Apple TV+, which recently arrived on Android mobile devices too. Season 2 began airing on Jan. 17, 2025, and will include 10 episodes, ending on March 21, 2025.
Do you have a favorite Severance fan-made experience? Let me know: [email protected].
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Meta, X approved ads containing violent anti-Muslim, antisemitic hate speech ahead of German election, study finds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d8f/a8d8f9035ec0eef88cdfc33476735ac4cfeac907" alt=""
Social media giants Meta and X approved ads targeting users in Germany with violent anti-Muslim and anti-Jew hate speech in the run-up to the country’s federal elections, according to new research from Eko, a corporate responsibility nonprofit campaign group.
The group’s researchers tested whether the two platforms’ ad review systems would approve or reject submissions for ads containing hateful and violent messaging targeting minorities ahead of an election where immigration has taken center stage in mainstream political discourse — including ads containing anti-Muslim slurs; calls for immigrants to be imprisoned in concentration camps or to be gassed; and AI-generated imagery of mosques and synagogues being burnt.
Most of the test ads were approved within hours of being submitted for review in mid-February. Germany’s federal elections are set to take place on Sunday, February 23.
Hate speech ads scheduled
Eko said X approved all 10 of the hate speech ads its researchers submitted just days before the federal election is due to take place, while Meta approved half (five ads) for running on Facebook (and potentially also Instagram) — though it rejected the other five.
The reason Meta provided for the five rejections indicated the platform believed there could be risks of political or social sensitivity which might influence voting.
However, the five ads that Meta approved included violent hate speech likening Muslim refugees to a “virus,” “vermin,” or “rodents,” branding Muslim immigrants as “rapists,” and calling for them to be sterilized, burnt, or gassed. Meta also approved an ad calling for synagogues to be torched to “stop the globalist Jewish rat agenda.”
As a sidenote, Eko says none of the AI-generated imagery it used to illustrate the hate speech ads was labeled as artificially generated — yet half of the 10 ads were still approved by Meta, regardless of the company having a policy that requires disclosure of the use of AI imagery for ads about social issues, elections or politics.
X, meanwhile, approved all five of these hateful ads — and a further five that contained similarly violent hate speech targeting Muslims and Jews.
These additional approved ads included messaging attacking “rodent” immigrants that the ad copy claimed are “flooding” the country “to steal our democracy,” and an antisemitic slur which suggested that Jews are lying about climate change in order to destroy European industry and accrue economic power.
The latter ad was combined with AI-generated imagery depicting a group of shadowy men sitting around a table surrounded by stacks of gold bars, with a Star of David on the wall above them — with the visuals also leaning heavily into antisemitic tropes.
Another ad X approved contained a direct attack on the SPD, the center-left party that currently leads Germany’s coalition government, with a bogus claim that the party wants to take in 60 million Muslim refugees from the Middle East, before going on to try to whip up a violent response. X also duly scheduled an ad suggesting “leftists” want “open borders”, and calling for the extermination of Muslims “rapists.”
Elon Musk, the owner of X, has used the social media platform where he has close to 220 million followers to personally intervene in the German election. In a tweet in December, he called for German voters to back the Far Right AfD party to “save Germany.” He has also hosted a livestream with the AfD’s leader, Alice Weidel, on X.
Eko’s researchers disabled all test ads before any that had been approved were scheduled to run to ensure no users of the platform were exposed to the violent hate speech.
It says the tests highlight glaring flaws with the ad platforms’ approach to content moderation. Indeed, in the case of X, it’s not clear whether the platform is doing any moderation of ads, given all 10 violent hate speech ads were quickly approved for display.
The findings also suggest that the ad platforms could be earning revenue as a result of distributing violent hate speech.
EU’s Digital Services Act in the frame
Eko’s tests suggests that neither platform is properly enforcing bans on hate speech they both claim to apply to ad content in their own policies. Furthermore, in the case of Meta, Eko reached the same conclusion after conducting a similar test in 2023 ahead of new EU online governance rules coming in — suggesting the regime has no effect on how it operates.
“Our findings suggest that Meta’s AI-driven ad moderation systems remain fundamentally broken, despite the Digital Services Act (DSA) now being in full effect,” an Eko spokesperson told TechCrunch.
“Rather than strengthening its ad review process or hate speech policies, Meta appears to be backtracking across the board,” they added, pointing to the company’s recent announcement about rolling back moderation and fact-checking policies as a sign of “active regression” that they suggested puts it on a direct collision course with DSA rules on systemic risks.
Eko has submitted its latest findings to the European Commission, which oversees enforcement of key aspects of the DSA on the pair of social media giants. It also said it shared the results with both companies, but neither responded.
The EU has open DSA investigations into Meta and X, which include concerns about election security and illegal content, but the Commission has yet to conclude these proceedings. Though, back in April it said it suspects Meta of inadequate moderation of political ads.
A preliminary decision on a portion of its DSA investigation on X, which was announced in July, included suspicions that the platform is failing to live up to the regulation’s ad transparency rules. However, the full investigation, which kicked off in December 2023, also concerns illegal content risks, and the EU has yet to arrive at any findings on the bulk of the probe well over a year later.
Confirmed breaches of the DSA can attract penalties of up to 6% of global annual turnover, while systemic non-compliance could even lead to regional access to violating platforms being blocked temporarily.
But, for now, the EU is still taking its time to make up its mind on the Meta and X probes so — pending final decisions — any DSA sanctions remain up in the air.
Meanwhile, it’s now just a matter of hours before German voters go to the polls — and a growing body of civil society research suggests that the EU’s flagship online governance regulation has failed to shield the major EU economy’s democratic process from a range of tech-fueled threats.
Earlier this week, Global Witness released the results of tests of X and TikTok’s algorithmic “For You” feeds in Germany, which suggest the platforms are biased in favor of promoting AfD content versus content from other political parties. Civil society researchers have also accused X of blocking data access to prevent them from studying election security risks in the run-up to the German poll — access the DSA is supposed to enable.
“The European Commission has taken important steps by opening DSA investigations into both Meta and X, now we need to see the Commission take strong action to address the concerns raised as part of these investigations,” Eko’s spokesperson also told us.
“Our findings, alongside mounting evidence from other civil society groups, show that Big Tech will not clean up its platforms voluntarily. Meta and X continue to allow illegal hate speech, incitement to violence, and election disinformation to spread at scale, despite their legal obligations under the DSA,” the spokesperson added. (We have withheld the spokesperson’s name to prevent harassment.)
“Regulators must take strong action — both in enforcing the DSA but also for example implementing pre-election mitigation measures. This could include turning off profiling-based recommender systems immediately before elections, and implementing other appropriate ‘break-glass’ measures to prevent algorithmic amplification of borderline content, such as hateful content in the run-up elections.”
The campaign group also warns that the EU is now facing pressure from the Trump administration to soften its approach to regulating Big Tech. “In the current political climate, there’s a real danger that the Commission doesn’t fully enforce these new laws as a concession to the U.S.,” they suggest.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Court filings show Meta staffers discussed using copyrighted content for AI training
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595f/c595f25ce0cb350a9b5523482e242381b84db4d5" alt=""
For years, Meta employees have internally discussed using copyrighted works obtained through legally questionable means to train the company’s AI models, according to court documents unsealed on Thursday.
The documents were submitted by plaintiffs in the case Kadrey v. Meta, one of many AI copyright disputes slowly winding through the U.S. court system. The defendant, Meta, claims that training models on IP-protected works, particularly books, is “fair use.” The plaintiffs, who include authors Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, disagree.
Previous materials submitted in the suit alleged that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg gave Meta’s AI team the OK to train on copyrighted content and that Meta halted AI training data licensing talks with book publishers. But the new filings, most of which show portions of internal work chats between Meta staffers, paint the clearest picture yet of how Meta may have come to use copyrighted data to train its models, including models in the company’s Llama family.
In one chat, Meta employees, including Melanie Kambadur, a senior manager for Meta’s Llama model research team, discussed training models on works they knew may be legally fraught.
“[M]y opinion would be (in the line of ‘ask forgiveness, not for permission’): we try to acquire the books and escalate it to execs so they make the call,” wrote Xavier Martinet, a Meta research engineer, in a chat dated February 2023, according to the filings. “[T]his is why they set up this gen ai org for [sic]: so we can be less risk averse.”
Martinet floated the idea of buying e-books at retail prices to build a training set rather than cutting licensing deals with individual book publishers. After another staffer pointed out that using unauthorized, copyrighted materials might be grounds for a legal challenge, Martinet doubled down, arguing that “a gazillion” startups were probably already using pirated books for training.
“I mean, worst case: we found out it is finally ok, while a gazillion start up [sic] just pirated tons of books on bittorrent,” Martinet wrote, according to the filings. “[M]y 2 cents again: trying to have deals with publishers directly takes a long time …”
In the same chat, Kambadur, who noted Meta was in talks with document hosting platform Scribd “and others” for licenses, cautioned that while using “publicly available data” for model training would require approvals, Meta’s lawyers were being “less conservative” than they had been in the past with such approvals.
“Yeah we definitely need to get licenses or approvals on publicly available data still,” Kambadur said, according to the filings. “[D]ifference now is we have more money, more lawyers, more bizdev help, ability to fast track/escalate for speed, and lawyers are being a bit less conservative on approvals.”
Talks of Libgen
In another work chat relayed in the filings, Kambadur discusses possibly using Libgen, a “links aggregator” that provides access to copyrighted works from publishers, as an alternative to data sources that Meta might license.
Libgen has been sued a number of times, ordered to shut down, and fined tens of millions of dollars for copyright infringement. One of Kambadur’s colleagues responded with a screenshot of a Google Search result for Libgen containing the snippet “No, Libgen is not legal.”
Some decision-makers within Meta appear to have been under the impression that failing to use Libgen for model training could seriously hurt Meta’s competitiveness in the AI race, according to the filings.
In an email addressed to Meta AI VP Joelle Pineau, Sony Theakanath, director of product management at Meta, called Libgen “essential to meet SOTA numbers across all categories,” referring to topping the best, state-of-the-art (SOTA) AI models and benchmark categories.
Theakanath also outlined “mitigations” in the email intended to help reduce Meta’s legal exposure, including removing data from Libgen “clearly marked as pirated/stolen” and also simply not publicly citing usage. “We would not disclose use of Libgen datasets used to train,” as Theakanath put it.
In practice, these mitigations entailed combing through Libgen files for words like “stolen” or “pirated,” according to the filings.
In a work chat, Kambadur mentioned that Meta’s AI team also tuned models to “avoid IP risky prompts” — that is, configured the models to refuse to answer questions like “reproduce the first three pages of ‘Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone’” or “tell me which e-books you were trained on.”
The filings contain other revelations, implying that Meta may have scraped Reddit data for some type of model training, possibly by mimicking the behavior of a third-party app called Pushshift. Notably, Reddit said in April 2023 that it planned to begin charging AI companies to access data for model training.
In one chat dated March 2024, Chaya Nayak, director of product management at Meta’s generative AI org, said that Meta leadership was considering “overriding” past decisions on training sets, including a decision not to use Quora content or licensed books and scientific articles, to ensure the company’s models had sufficient training data.
Nayak implied that Meta’s first-party training datasets — Facebook and Instagram posts, text transcribed from videos on Meta platforms, and certain Meta for Business messages — simply weren’t enough. “[W]e need more data,” she wrote.
The plaintiffs in Kadrey v. Meta have amended their complaint several times since the case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, in 2023. The latest alleges that Meta, among other claims, cross-referenced certain pirated books with copyrighted books available for license to determine whether it made sense to pursue a licensing agreement with a publisher.
In a sign of how high Meta considers the legal stakes to be, the company has added two Supreme Court litigators from the law firm Paul Weiss to its defense team on the case.
Meta didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Brian Armstrong says Coinbase spent $50M fighting SEC lawsuit — and beat it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4514b/4514bafe20069708b7e7dd8e43c1ec770d2e0799" alt=""
Coinbase on Friday said the SEC has agreed to drop the lawsuit against the company with prejudice, meaning it cannot be filed again.
The move, which is still subject to the approval of the SEC’s Commissioners, is yet another signal that the Trump administration plans to be more friendly to crypto than the SEC was under former leader Gary Gensler.
The SEC’s lawsuit, filed in 2023, alleged that crypto assets were securities and that Coinbase was operating as “an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency.”
Coinbase fought back, arguing, in part, that the SEC hadn’t established clear enough rules concerning crypto in order to sue over breaking them.
“I remember in 2023, a lot of people were advising on this and they were saying, ‘Do not engage in litigation with the SEC; it’s going to cost you tens of millions of dollars,’” Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said in a video he posted on X on Friday announcing that the suit was being dropped. In the video, Armstrong also made allegations about the SEC’s motivations and tactics.
Armstrong said he fought because he believed that he was saving the crypto industry in America.
“Not as many other companies had deep pockets like we did,” he said. “And ultimately we had to spend $50 million defending this case” — proving the naysayers right on how expensive the fight would be.
A Coinbase spokesperson clarified that this amount included strictly external legal fees, not employee time.
Coinbase’s apparent legal victory aside, Armstrong said that he still believes that the U.S. needs “to get legislation for crypto passed” to codify favorable regulations, or risk falling behind other nations.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
iOS 18.4 will bring Apple Intelligence-powered ‘Priority Notifications’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83750/8375070e54d4621cf6c3e6f8acc2e4cba1d87769" alt=""
Apple on Friday released its first developer beta for iOS 18.4, which adds a new “Priority Notifications” feature, powered by Apple Intelligence. The addition aims to help users manage their notifications by prioritizing important alerts and minimizing distractions from less important ones.
These priority notifications are displayed in a separate section on the phone’s Lock Screen. Apple Intelligence will analyze which notifications it believes should be shown in this section, but you can still swipe up to view all of your notifications.
Currently, the iPhone will sort notifications chronologically, with the most recent alerts displayed on top. With the new feature, you’ll see important notifications first — even if you received them a while ago when compared to others.
According to 9to5Mac, Priority Notifications is off by default, but you can enable the feature by heading to your Settings app, selecting the “Notifications” option, and then opening the “Prioritize Notifications” section. Here, you can toggle the feature on.
Apple announced today that Apple Intelligence is heading to the Vision Pro as part of visionOS 2.4. A beta version of the software is currently available for developers, while the public version is set for an April release. The tech giant also revealed Apple News+ Food, an upcoming section that will allow users to search and save recipes from dozens of existing News+ publishing partners.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says market got it wrong about DeepSeek’s impact
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fa95/6fa951b688bccb6ffd542c7a6e094fdb1807f689" alt=""
Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang said the market got it wrong when it comes to DeepSeek’s technological advancements and its potential to negatively impact the chipmaker’s business.
Instead, Huang called DeepSeek’s R1 open source reasoning model “incredibly exciting” while speaking with Alex Bouzari, CEO of DataDirect Networks, in a pre-recorded interview that was released on Thursday.
“I think the market responded to R1, as in, ‘Oh my gosh. AI is finished,’” Huang told Bouzari. “You know, it dropped out of the sky. We don’t need to do any computing anymore. It’s exactly the opposite. It’s [the] complete opposite.”
Huang said that the release of R1 is inherently good for the AI market and will accelerate the adoption of AI as opposed to this release meaning that the market no longer had a use for compute resources — like the ones Nvidia produces.
“It’s making everybody take notice that, okay, there are opportunities to have the models be far more efficient than what we thought was possible,” Huang said. “And so it’s expanding, and it’s accelerating the adoption of AI.”
He also pointed out that, despite the advancements DeepSeek made in pre-training AI models, post-training will remain important and resource-intensive.
“Reasoning is a fairly compute-intensive part of it,” Huang added.
Nvidia declined to provide further commentary.
Huang’s comments come almost a month after DeepSeek released the open source version of its R1 model which rocked the AI market in general and seemed to disproportionately affect Nvidia. The company’s stock price plummeted 16.9% in one market day upon the release of DeepSeek’s news.
Nvidia’s stock closed at $142.62 a share on January 24, according to data from Yahoo Finance. The following Monday, January 27, the stock dropped rapidly and closed at $118.52 a share. This event wiped $600 billion off of Nvidia’s market cap in just three days.
The chip company’s stock has almost fully recovered since then. On Friday the stock opened at $140 a share, which means the company has been able to almost fully regain that lost value in about a month. Nvidia reports its Q4 earnings on February 26 which will likely address the market reaction more.
Meanwhile, DeepSeek announced on Thursday that it plans to open source five code repositories as part of an “open source week” event next week.
Keep reading the article on Tech Crunch